The Wiert Corner – irregular stream of stuff

Jeroen W. Pluimers on .NET, C#, Delphi, databases, and personal interests

  • My badges

    Mastodon

  • Twitter Updates

  • My Flickr Stream

    20140508-Delphi-2007--Project-Options--Cannot-Edit-Application-Title-HelpFile-Icon-Theming20140430-Fiddler-Filter-Actions-Button-Run-Filterset-now20140424-VMware-Fusion-6.0.3.-no-reclaimable
    More Photos

  • Pages

  • All categories

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,860 other subscribers
«
»

Some phrases that might set apart text-content as LLM generated

Posted by jpluimers on 2024/03/31

Starting the 2022-2023 period, more and more generative AI content has entered search engines.

The below queries give you some pointers on how to spot those. They return scholar articles from 2023 and later.

Note the list is in alphabetical order for easier reading, but the number of results (in parenthesis) are very different from that order. I was quite amazed to see “As an AI language model” scoring 45 results.

Examples:

Via

and these Tweets

  1. [Wayback/Archive] Gary Marcus on X: “Oh god, it’s already worse than I thought. The #enshittification of science is already in full swing.”
  2. [Wayback/Archive] Evan Washington on X: “this is so grim”

    Certainly, here is an expanded list of generic references that you can use as a starting point. If you have specific sources in mind, please provide the details for a more accurate reference list.

    [Wayback/Archive] GIqwB_nXkAA3qL5.png (770×642)

     

    Certainly, here is information about the process of a clinical trial application presented in a point-wise format:

    [Wayback/Archive] GIqwB_kWAAEK786.png (772×626)

     

    Certainly, here is a list of both Geo-natural and geosynthetic materials commonly used in civil engineering and environmental applications

    [Wayback/Archive] GIqwB_lXIAA_RVX.png (788×566)

     

    Certainly, here is a concise summary of the provided sections:

    [Wayback/Archive] GIqwB_mWoAAlVsX.jpg (1012×546)

    [Wayback/Archive] https://cdn.syndication.twimg.com/tweet-result?id=1768419398191034734…

  3. [Wayback/Archive] Nicolas Moiroux @NMoiroux@ecoevo.social on X: “@RetractionWatch Want to see more, try this search on Google scholar: “certainly, here is” -chatgpt -llm scholar.google.fr/scholar?hl=fr&as_sdt=05&as_ylo=2023&q=certainly+here+is+-chatgpt+-llm&oq=certainly+here+is+-chatgpt+-llm “
  4. [Wayback/Archive] Retraction Watch on X: “An Elsevier paper written by ChatGPT goes viral.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023024002402“

    Certainly, here is a possible introduction for your topic:

    [Wayback/Archive] GIpkqSJW0AENtTh.jpg (961×1200)

    [Wayback/Archive] cdn.syndication.twimg.com/tweet-result?id=1768336483641880619&token=!

  5. [Wayback/Archive] Guillaume Cabanac ⟨here and elsewhere⟩ on X: “So #ChatGPT wrote the first sentence of this @ElsevierConnect article. Any other parts of the article too? How come none of the coauthors, Editor-in-Chief, reviewers, typesetters noticed? How can this happen with regular peer-review? pubpeer.com/publications/CAABBF887348FB2D1C0329E0A27BE6 “

    Certainly, here is a possible introduction for your topic:

    …

    This article does not acknowledge the use of ChatGPT. It does not contain any occurrence of ‘ChatGPT, say in the method section or in the acknowledgments, as recommended in this Nature and in this ACS Nano editorial.
    Did the authors copy-paste the output of ChatGPT and include this chatbot’s prologue by mistake?
    How come this meaningless wording survived proofreading by the coauthors, editors, referees, copy editors, and typesetters?

    [Wayback/Archive] GIeuv9uXUAAhe7k.jpg (961×1200)

    [Wayback/Archive] cdn.syndication.twimg.com/tweet-result?id=1767574447337124290&token=!

  6. [Wayback/Archive] Kasper Planeta Kepp on X: “@gcabanac @ElsevierConnect @RetractionWatch @HollyElse @byamandahoover @gvconroy @JeffreyBrainard @joelving @rhysblakely On a similar note, I wonder if @ElsevierConnect is going to fix this: sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214785323026287“

    Regenerate response

    [Wayback/Archive] GIkqtCXWMAAF-62.png (700×362)

    [Wayback/Archive] cdn.syndication.twimg.com/tweet-result?id=1767994844775919649&token=!

  7. [Wayback/Archive] Simon on X: “@RetractionWatch Another Elsevier 👀”

    I’m very sorry, but I don’t have access to real-time informa- tion or patient-specific data, as I am an Al language model. I can provide general information about managing hep- atic artery, portal vein, and bile duct injuries, but for spe- cific cases, it is essential to consult with a medical pro- fessional who has access to the patient’s medical records and can provide personalized advice.

    [Wayback/Archive] GIp1vVkXcAEkuF3.jpg (1200×1159)

    [Wayback/Archive] cdn.syndication.twimg.com/tweet-result?id=1768355339697541185&token=!

Google Search queries:

--jeroen

This entry was posted on 2024/03/31 at 12:00 and is filed under AI and ML; Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, ChatGPT, Development, GPT-3, GPT-4, LLM, Software Development. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

«
»