 | Lars Fosdal on Security alarm provider Woonve… |
 | Thomas Mueller on Question got closed in May 202… |
 | Thaddy de Koning on Formulier voor bewindvoerders… |
| Thaddy de Koning on Formulier voor bewindvoerders… |
| Thaddy de Koning on Formulier voor bewindvoerders… |
Posted by jpluimers on 2015/05/01
Interesting, Lars Fosdal writes:
VS/C#6 is out-delphi-ing Delphi.
I hope EMBT is paying attention.
Currently live at http://channel9.msdn.com/
I already liked the 7 minute C#6 video from last year. This is even better.
–jeroen
via: VS/C#6 is out-delphi-ing Delphi. I hope EMBT is paying attention. Currently….
Posted in .NET, C#, C# 6 (Roslyn), Delphi, Development, Software Development, VB.NET, VB.NET 14.0 | 10 Comments »
Posted by jpluimers on 2015/04/22
A long and shorter while ago, I wrote about practicing your coding and test driven development skills:
Here are some Coding Kata videos of the Bowling Game Kata in various languages and environments. Some of them are dumb (no audio) just like good practice usually is. Note: it helps to know a bit about 10 Pin Bowling Scoring rules.
And since I want to learn Haskell and have done a lot of Tic-Tac-Toe demos inthe past:
For more background information:
–jeroen
Posted in .NET, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, C# 6 (Roslyn), Development, Java, Python, RemObjects C#, Ruby, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2015/04/07
During any software life cycle, you will want to phase out some code, and most likely want to mark code to be phased out in the future.
So here are two examples on how to do that in C# and in Delphi that just shows the effects of obsoleting/deprecating code.
Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, C# 6 (Roslyn), Delphi, Delphi 2005, Delphi 2006, Delphi 2007, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi 6, Delphi 7, Delphi 8, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Delphi XE4, Delphi XE5, Delphi XE6, Development, Software Development | 6 Comments »
Posted by jpluimers on 2015/04/02
I’m going to experiment with this. Most likely the quality of the code samples will be the biggest factor in like/dislike result.
–jeroen
Posted in .NET, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, C# 6 (Roslyn), Development, Software Development, Visual Studio 2010, Visual Studio 2013, Visual Studio 2014, Visual Studio and tools | 1 Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2015/03/26
Next time I run into .NET and native threading issues:
Main UI threads often have a correlation between managed and native thread IDs.
But for other threads, you cannot be really sure.
Some background articles on this:
–jeroen
Posted in .NET, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, C# 6 (Roslyn), Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2015/02/04
Thanks Stefan Glienke for pointing me to NCrunch for Visual Studio:
NCrunch is an automated concurrent testing tool for Visual Studio.
It intelligently runs automated tests so that you don’t have to, and gives you a huge amount of useful information about your tested code, such as code coverage and performance metrics, inline in your IDE while you type.
–jeroen
Posted in .NET, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, C# 6 (Roslyn), Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2014/11/27
7 minutes of very interesting video: clear explanation of What’s New In C# 6.0 | Connect; Microsoft Visual Studio vNext & Azure | Channel 9.
—jeroen
Posted in .NET, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 6 (Roslyn), Development, Software Development | 1 Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2014/08/14
Very nice summary: Developing an app on Microsoft Azure: a few quick reflections….
–jeroen
Posted in .NET, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, C# 6 (Roslyn), Cloud Development, Development, Software Development, Visual Studio 2013, Visual Studio 2014, Visual Studio and tools, Windows Azure | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2014/05/02
I totally agree with Tim Anderson here:
Open source, native code compilation, and an innovative compiler: it adds up to huge changes for C# and .NET, positive ones as far as I can tell.
–jeroen
Posted in .NET, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 6 (Roslyn), Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2014/04/27
Reminder to self:
–jeroen
via: C# and VB are open sourced | Fabulous Adventures In Coding.
Posted in .NET, C#, C# 6 (Roslyn), Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
The Wiert Corner - irregular stream of stuff 