The Wiert Corner – irregular stream of stuff

Jeroen W. Pluimers on .NET, C#, Delphi, databases, and personal interests

  • My badges

  • Twitter Updates

  • My Flickr Stream

  • Pages

  • All categories

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,854 other subscribers

Archive for the ‘Event’ Category

Delphi multi-threading: confused by TThread.Synchronize / TThread.Queue? You’re not alone. And you need to be aware of exceptions there too.

Posted by jpluimers on 2020/01/01

Below an elaboration on my answer to the question [WayBack] I don’t understand the following part of the second Delphi example:TThread.Synchronize… – Alberto Paganini – Google+:

I was looking at the Task example at the EMB wiki link below

http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/Tokyo/en/Tutorial:_Using_Tasks_from_the_Parallel_Programming_Library

and I don’t understand the following part of the second Delphi example:

TThread.Synchronize(nil,
  procedure
  begin
    Label1.Text := lValue.ToString;
  end);

why is there the need to pass Label1.Text := lValue.ToString; as procedure in TThread.Synchronize ?

Why not a simple Label1.Text := lValue.ToString; ?

Basically that question can be either of these:

  1. Why is there no easier language construct than wrapping the callback in a procedure (anonymous method).
  2. Why a call to TThread.Synchronize at all?

The tutorial that Alberto refers to is [WayBack] Tutorial: Using Tasks from the Parallel Programming Library – RAD Studio. That example uses the TTask feature in Delphi, but the portion he has a question about is general to any multi-treading in Delphi that touches the updating of a VCL or FMX UI from another thread.

This is the more complete code in the meant example:

procedure TForm1.ButtonTask1Click(Sender: TObject);
var
  lValue: Integer;
begin
    Label1.Text := '--';
    TTask.Run(procedure
      begin
          {Some calculation that takes time}
          Sleep(3000);
          lValue := Random(10);
          TThread.Synchronize(nil,
            procedure
            begin
                  Label1.Text := lValue.ToString;
            end);
      end);
end;

What happens here is that the TTask is used to run some code (starting with {Some calculation that takes time}) in a different thread (that is being determined by the framework behind TTask).

I recommend against using TTask (or any other part of the Delphi Parallel Programming Library) as I agree with Stefan Glienke in [WayBack] Hello, Do you know why the “default” keyword of a class property is sometime defined also as an attribute ? – Paul TOTH – Google+:

If that works as well as the PPL does I would not touch it with a 10 foot pole ;)

With “that”, he refers to the APL (Asynchronous Programming Library [Archive.is]) which got introduced in Delphi XE8 and adds asynchronous support for UI controls, but unlike .NET (which implements it on the .NET TControl equivalent) shifted it down to TComponent probably because that’s the common ancestor for both VCL and FMX. But that’s a topic for another day.

The Delphi Parallel Programming Library (DPL) is a complex and intricate framework originally started as Delphi Parallel Library (DPL) and modelled after [WayBackIntel’s Threading Building Blocks (TBB) and Microsoft’s Task Parallel Library (TPL) (not in WayBack, but moved to the CHM file [WayBack], see also[WayBack] Task Parallel Library changes since the MSDN Magazine article | Parallel Programming with .NET)

Most parts of the DPL were written over at least 7 years time by former Chief Scientist Allen Bauer and introduced in Delphi XE7 as the Delphi Parallel Programming Library (PPL), see [WayBack] Delphi Parallel Programming Library & Memory Managers – Steve Maughan and [WayBack] The Oracle at Delphi: Lock my Object… Please!.

Since Delphi XE7, the PPL hardly got maintenance and now most if not all of the people having knowledge about it have left Embarcadero: early 2016, [Archive.is] Delphi Chief Scientist Allen Bauer Has Left Embarcadero/Idera | Hacker News leaving a big gap as “There are no plans that I’m aware of to move someone into my old position… All those that I would consider qualified are either already gone or are currently looking elsewhere.” (it is not in the [WayBack] part of How safe is Delphis future? Who is the new Lead Compiler Engineer? Who is the new Chief Scientist? – Ralf Stocker – Google+, hence the screen shot).

Luckily, Allen copied most of his old Embarcadero blog over to his personal one (including comments!), so there is quite some historic reference, see for instance [WayBack] Thread pools <> Task handling. – Community Blogs – Embarcadero Community and [WayBack] The Oracle at Delphi: Thread pools <> Task handling.

So back ensuring you can execute some code on the main thread and the questions from the G+ post:

  1. Why is there no easier language construct than wrapping the callback in a procedure (anonymous method).
  2. Why a call to TThread.Synchronize at all?

Lets start with the questions in order I answered them, starting with the my response:

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Conference Topics, Conferences, Delphi, Development, Event, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

Learn so say ‘No’: ‘No’ your way to trust workshop

Posted by jpluimers on 2019/11/29

[WayBack‘No’ your way to trust workshop slide deck:

Published on 

We should say ‘no’ far more often than we do. Why we don’t, the consequences, and how to get comfortable with and effective in saying ‘no’ is the subject of this workshop. Beauty is that you don’t even need to say ‘no’ in order to express ‘no’. First facilitated at Agile and Beyond 2018.

via: [WayBack] Facilitated my ‘No’ your way to trust workshop today at Agile and Beyond #aab18 Happy that it was well received by the audience of … mostly speakers … – Marjan Venema – Google+

–jeroen

Posted in Conference Topics, Conferences, Event, LifeHacker, Power User | Leave a Comment »

delphi – Spring4D: Why is list of type TObjectList freed automatically after iteration? – Stack Overflow

Posted by jpluimers on 2019/11/28

A nice question and even nicer answer at [WayBack] delphi – Why is list of type TObjectList freed automatically after iteration? – Stack Overflow.

It comes down to the Spring4D collection classes expecting to be accessed using interface references because they descend from TInterfacedObject which also favours interface references over object references.

If you access them solely using object references, they start out with a reference count of 0 (zero). If an operation then first increases that to 1 (one), then decreases it back to 0 (zero), the collection instance gets freed.

A few nice tips and (sometimes opposing) opinions from the question/answer thread and the referencing G+ thread [WayBack] What do you think, +Stefan Glienke? ##Spring4D – Agustin Ortu – Google+ make them well worth reading.

Some:

  • Instead of TObjectList<TFuu>.Create, you should use TCollections.CreateObjectList<TFuu>.
    This way, you only need Spring.Collections in your uses clause
  • interface-only usage should be enforced by hiding the classes in the implementation, exposing only interfaces
  • The functions of TCollections only return interface references and – more importantly – allow for code folding starting with Spring4D 1.2.
  • Hiding the classes in an implementation part is not possible because then this would break any possibility to inherit from these classes and extend them (as I know people do).
  • Never use object references to classes that inherit from TInterfacedObject because the reference counting can kick in and destroy your instance anywhere (or manually call _AddRef/_Release).
  • if you want to have classes, then use System.Generics.Collections

–jeroen

Posted in Conference Topics, Conferences, Delphi, Development, Event, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

Tech Debt by MonkeyUser

Posted by jpluimers on 2019/11/07

[WayBack] Tech Debt (by MonkeyUser: Software development satire) is one of the best images on Tech Debt I ever encoutered (via[WayBack] Tech Debt by @ismonkeyuser https://www.monkeyuser.com/2018/tech-debt – ThisIsWhyICode – Google+):

–jeroen

Posted in Agile, Conference Topics, Conferences, Development, Event, Software Development, Technical Debt | Leave a Comment »

How to convert a Delphi enum or set to a JSON value, with different specific values…

Posted by jpluimers on 2019/11/07

As I will probably need this one day: [WayBack] How does one convert a Delphi enum to a JSON value, with different specific values? – CHUA Chee Wee – Google+:

eg, TEnum1 = (test1, test2, test3)

TSomeClass.FEnum := test1;

When converted to JSON, I’d like to see maybe
{"Enum": "Value1"} instead of test1

and test2 to "Godzilla", test3 to "Tiburon"

The solution is in his repository: github/chuacw/EnumJson:

After initially suggesting to look into [Archive.is] Serializing User Objects – RAD Studio, he based his solution on a set of clever tricks circumventing Delphi compiler limitations and bugs:

Later he extended the solution to include sets in additions to enums: [Archive.is] Persisting enumeration and sets to JSON – Chee Wee’s blog: IT solutions for Singapore and companies worldwide (via [Archive.isMade my JSON interceptor demo public. Now you can save your enum and sets to JSON, with customized output to boot! – CHUA Chee Wee – Google+)

Clever!

Hopefully this got Lars Fosdal some ideas to solve [WayBackJSON in Berlin – Can I persuade TJSon to treat “params” as it was a string and not an object for the TJsonRPC class? – Lars Fosdal – Google+

Enums with Delphi

Enums with Delphi and their mapping is a repeating topic, see for instance [WayBack] What’s the easiest (ie., least coding) way to map an enum to a const string and vice versa? (Can attributes be used on enum values yet?) eg., type TMyColor… – David Schwartz – Google+

It shows how much the Delphi language is in need of language enhancements as right now there are way too many open source libraries struggling with the same issues each working around them or providing solutions in slightly different way.

Three things immediately come to mind:

  • the NameOf that – analogous to TypeOf – gets the name of an identifier as a string
  • expose all RTTI for all enum types (especially the ones with non-contiguous values or starting at another value than ordinal zero)
  • allow for attributes on enum values

Some examples of libraries providing enumeration support:

Some more thoughts from a different perspective: [WayBackWhat’s New in Edge Rails: Active Record enums

–jeroen

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Conference Topics, Conferences, Delphi, Development, Event, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

The Delphi System.Exit “Function”

Posted by jpluimers on 2019/10/17

Still wrongly documented as System.Exit Function [WayBack], most people think it is a statement.

However, it is a compiler intrinsic procedure in the System unit that – when called inside a real function – optionally accepts a parameter with the same type as the encompassing function because it is a compiler intrinsic. It kind of acts as an overloaded procedure, but in fact translate to machine code via an intermediate parse tree.

The parameterless version has been there since at least Turbo Pascal 3.0, but the parameterised version is more recent: I think it was introduced around Delphi 7.

It then stops executing that function after first executing any explicit or implicit finally blocks.

I’ve seen various projects that used their own Exit procedure. This is a very bad habit: Since the System unit is always further away in scope, the introduced one is called which can severely confuse programmers not being aware of this.

The code generation for the parameterless and parameterised  “overloads” of System.Exit is slightly different:

  • The parameterless one can often be optimised away, for instance folding multiple calls to them into one, or rearranging code execution so a jump isn’t needed any more. This means you cannot always put a breakpoint on them.
  • The parameterised one always needs code to load the function result, so you can always put a breakpoint on them.

Stefan Glienke explained the above in [WayBack] The advantage of using Exit() instead of a plain Exit? You can place a breakpoint! – Uwe Raabe – Google+

–jeroen

Posted in Conference Topics, Conferences, Delphi, Development, Event, Software Development | 1 Comment »

How to debug small programs

Posted by jpluimers on 2019/10/17

As a follow up of SSCCE, MWE and MCVE are basically the same: provide code people can use to reproduce a problem, I found [WayBackHow to debug small programs which is starts as

One of the most frequent categories of bad questions I see on StackOverflow is: I wrote this program for my assignment and it doesn’t work. [20 lines of code]. And… that’s it.

Then it goes on how to debug those pieces of code, trim them into an SSCCE/MWE/MCVW to form the base of a question which you can ask on StackOverflow/SuperUser/ServerFault/StackExchange, forum, group/community or even your co-worker.

The really cool thing about the techniques used there are that they also apply to bigger pieces of code, heck even large code bases.

They force you to trim down your problem in to manageable pieces that are easy to explain and write concise documentation and tests around them to assist you in the process.

Below are the steps in a short list. Be sure to read the original article How to debug small programs | Fabulous adventures in coding after going through the list.

  1. Turn on compiler warnings, inspect all of them, resolve or explain them
  2. Rubber duck to an imaginary person or even a live one explaining each part in simple terms
  3. If the bug is still there, break up the code into pieces
  4. Write technical specifications for all the pieces
  5. Verify the pieces against the specifications, for instance by adding pre- and postconditions to them
  6. Add assertions in the pieces for all the specifications
  7. Write test cases for the pieces
  8. Write down on paper the expected behaviour for all the lines of code
  9. Use a debugger to step through all the lines of code and verify the expected behaviour you wrote down
  10. While debugging, listen to all your doubts (gut feeling is a good thing!)

This sounds like a lot of work. It is. All good programming is.

If you apply these before writing any logic code, then your life becomes easier because you will spot bugs sooner:

  • specification
  • test cases
  • preconditions
  • postconditions
  • assertions

Does this again sound like a lot of work?

Then remember: taking a shortcut will make the actual work longer. The reason is that hunting for bugs is a tedious and time consuming process scaling very badly with complexity.

–jeroen

Posted in Conference Topics, Conferences, Debugging, Development, Event, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

SSCCE, MWE and MCVE are basically the same: provide code people can use to reproduce a problem

Posted by jpluimers on 2019/10/16

Many times I see people asking questions about problems in their source code, it goes like this:

  1. Question is asked formulating the problem, but without any source code
  2. A comment asks for source code
  3. Either the response is “the source code is too big”, or the response contains a really big blob of (compressed) code that

If you have such questions (I still often have them), then you need to do just two things (which you often can combine in one step):

  1. Condense down the code into a small bit that others can use to reproduce the problem.
  2. Talk to an (imaginary) person explaining the problem you have and the condensed code.

The second is called Rubber Ducking after a story in the book The Pragmatic Programmer in which a programmer would carry around a rubber duck.

The first is known under at least three terms:

They all come down to the following:

Provide a small piece of working code that is readable anyone can use to reproduce a problem without much effort.

via: Can we create a Help Center topic that outlines what a SSCCE / MWE means for Stack Overflow?

–jeroen

Posted in Conference Topics, Conferences, Development, Event, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

Sprints, marathons and root canals and Brady Printed Lean Labels – for lean development

Posted by jpluimers on 2019/10/15

Apart from blank and custom labels, Brady also sells [WayBack] Brady Printed Lean Labels | BradyID.com

They work great for agile projects, despite marketed as “will help you improve reliability, up-time, and efficiency”.

I found them via:

 

which led me to [WayBack] Sprints, marathons and root canals, which is a long but recommended read.

That got me to a book that is now on my reading list: [WayBack] James Shore: Agile-Book, especially this chapter:

[WayBack] James Shore: The Art of Agile Development: Iteration Planning

 

Assorted sets of stickers are (all in packs of 10 each):

[WayBack] Brady Part: 110762 | Assorted Lean Stickers

[WayBackBrady Part: 110763 | Assorted Reliability Stickers

 

Though you can also get them individually in 10 packs:

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Agile, Conference Topics, Conferences, Development, Event, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

Great video “Why Functional Programming Matters”, by Ted Neward on getting started with Functional Programming

Posted by jpluimers on 2019/10/10

Great introduction into functional programming by a step by step: “Why Functional Programming Matters”, by Ted Neward on Devoxx Poland 2016.

It uses Java, but translates very well into C#, C++, Delphi and many other programming languages because the underlying support structures are very easy (a ~50 line Lists class, a few Function# prototypes, etc).

Two great observations here:

  • most variables don’t vary
  • collections are the gateway drug to becoming functional programmers

Summary

Coding Tech

In the latter half of the 2000s, a new kind of programming language seemed poised to take the steam out of the dominancen of object-oriented programming languages and their hold over “mainstream” development. But these new languages, collectively referred to as “functional” languages, were nothing new. In fact, they’ve been a part of the language landscape since the late 80s, and arguably even longer than that. What makes a functional language, and what makes a functional language interesting? Most importantly, why do we care now, thirty years after their introduction?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB8jN68KGcU

–jeroen

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Conference Topics, Conferences, Development, Event, Functional Programming, Software Development | Leave a Comment »