 | Jeroen Wiert Pluimer… on Does Odido (the old T-Mobile N… |
 | Lars Fosdal on Security alarm provider Woonve… |
 | Thomas Mueller on Question got closed in May 202… |
 | Thaddy de Koning on Formulier voor bewindvoerders… |
| Thaddy de Koning on Formulier voor bewindvoerders… |
Posted by jpluimers on 2020/01/16
[WayBack] Mad With PowerShell: FileInfo and DirectoryInfo objects are not populated upon creation in PowerShell.
TL;DR:
FullName property, the other poprerties of FileInfo and DirectoryInfo are populated later than their instance creationRefresh method populates or re-populates themFullNameExample: see the [Archive.is]fileinfo.cs: Length property
–jeroen
Posted in .NET, C#, CommandLine, Development, F#, PowerShell, Software Development, VB.NET | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2019/12/10
Every time I run into complex nested if/then/else statement in any language with truckloads of code blocks, it usually means it is time to refactor in two steps:
Of course this adds some overhead, but usually you end up with code that is easier to unit-test and understand both the overall structure and detailed implementations of.
I’m all for language enhancements that allow deeply nested logic to be more manageable (for instance by enhancing a case construct), but usually refactoring makes that less of a need and more of a nice to have.
Via: [WayBack] Anybody else have a gripe with nested if-then-else statements in Pascal? What if we had the following statement/syntax available in Pascal? … – Gerhard Venter – Google+
–jeroen
Posted in .NET, C#, Design Patterns, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2019/09/12
For my link archive.
Full text at: [WayBack] … why the Delphi language does not allow parameterless constructors… – David Heffernan – Google+
Abstract:
+Stefan Glienke deleted his post about parameterless record constructors, presumably due to all the off topic comments.
…
.net at CLR level does allow parameterless constructors on structs. But the C# language bans them: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/saxz13w4.aspx
Jon Skeet posted an answer on SO way back in 2008 on this topic: http://stackoverflow.com/a/333840/ From that answer:
—-
The CLR allows value types to have parameterless constructors, but C# doesn’t. I believe this is because it would introduce an expectation that the constructor would be called when it wouldn’t. For instance, consider this:
MyStruct[] foo = new MyStruct[1000];…
—-My guess is that Embarcadero decided to ban parameterless constructors on Delphi records for the same reason. Or perhaps they just copied the rules from C# without realising that the CLR supported parameterless struct constructors.
References:
--jeroen
Posted in .NET, C#, Delphi, Development, Jon Skeet, Software Development | Tagged: 1029 | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2019/07/16
Design Patterns and Refactoring articles and guides. Design Patterns video tutorials for newbies. Simple descriptions and full source code examples in Java, C++, C#, PHP and Delphi.
Source: [WayBack] Design Patterns & Refactoring.
And indeed a lot of examples in Delphi too; few sites have that: Delphi site:sourcemaking.com.
–jeroen
Via: [WayBack] I stumbled upon this yesterday, very informative, accessible and also with Delphi examples – among other languages. – Steffen Nyeland – Google+
Posted in .NET, C, C#, C++, Delphi, Design Patterns, Development, Java, Java Platform, PHP, Scripting, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2019/06/12
For my archive: [WayBack/Archive] Cyclomatic Complexity of switch case statement – Stack Overflow.
Ultimate reference: [WayBack/Archive] NIST Special Publication 500-235: Structured Testing: A Testing Methodology Using the Cyclomatic Complexity Metric
Via: [WayBack/Archive] I have a question regarding Cyclometric Complexity… IF versus CASE… – David Hoyle – Google+
–jeroen
Posted in .NET, C#, Conference Topics, Conferences, Delphi, Development, Event, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2019/05/15
One more thing to take away from Procedural Programming: It’s Back? It Never Went Away – Kevlin Henney [ACCU 2018] – YouTube was explained in [WayBack] How to Design Early Returns in C++ (Based on Procedural Programming) – Fluent C++.
Though in C++, it applies to all programming languages that stem from a procedural background (Pascal, C#, Java, golang, to name just a few).
The article is about keeping an if/else-if/else tree, even when they can be removed becomes some of their bodies perform an early return, as
In C++, as well as in other languages, the
returnkeyword has two responsibilities:
- interrupting control flow,
- yielding a value.
It basically comes down to this argument:
Essentially, the argument for Code #1 is that you need to know less to understand the structure of the code.
Indeed, if we fold away the contents of the if statements, Code #1 becomes this:
The structure of the code is very clear. There are 4 different paths based on the
year, they’re independent from each other, and each path will determine the boolean result of the function (if it doesn’t throw an exception).Now let’s see how Code #2 looks like when we fold away the if statements:
And now we know much less. Do the if statements contain a
return? Maybe.Do they depend on each other? Potentially.
Do some of them rely on the last
return falseof the function? Can’t tell.With Code #2, you need to look inside of the if statement to understand the structure of the function. For that reason, Code #1 requires a reader to know less to understand the structure. It gives away information more easily than Code #2.
–jeroen
via [WayBack] Kevlin Henney – Google+: How to Design Early Returns in C++ (Based on Procedural Programming) – Fluent C++
Posted in .NET, C, C#, C++, Conference Topics, Conferences, Delphi, Development, Event, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2019/04/23
Since I get this question every now and then: [WayBack] Should you convert your Visual Basic .NET project to C#? Why and why not… | Tim Anderson’s IT Writing.
Via [WayBack] Should you convert your Visual Basic .NET project to C#? Why and why not… https://www.itwriting.com/blog/11089-should-you-convert-your-visual-basic-net-… – Ondrej Kelle – Google+
–jeroen
Posted in .NET, C#, C# 6 (Roslyn), Development, Software Development, VB.NET | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2019/04/10
By now this
should be out of [WayBack] Draft – .NET Glossary Diagram – Scott Hanselman: a list of common terms to describe various parts of the .NET ecosystem.
He has a nice list of sentences where each term is used.
I’ll try to use them myself as well, so I gave it a start at paulcbetts/refit: The automatic type-safe REST library for Xamarin and .NET.
–jeroen
Posted in .NET, C#, Development, F#, Software Development, VB.NET, Visual Studio and tools | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2019/04/03
This is so cool: [WayBack] paulcbetts/refit: The automatic type-safe REST library for Xamarin and .NET. It’s inspired by Square’s [WayBack] Retrofit library which does the same for Java.
They basically allow you to use attributes on interfaces to define a type-safe wrapper around any REST interface, then instantiate a connection to it for making calls.
No more manual HttpClient fiddling!
Since it requires only .NET 1.4, you can basically run it on any platform as it’s supported covered by the implementations .NET Core, Mono and the full .NET Framework.
Quite a lot of projects already use it; I got there via the first link:
–jeroen
Via: [WayBack] Exploring refit, an automatic type-safe REST library for .NET Standard https://www.hanselman.com/blog/ExploringRefit… – Jeroen Wiert Pluimers – Google+
Posted in .NET, C#, Development, Java, Java Platform, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2019/03/27
The list below is based on a G+ discussion in a single language, but has way broader aspects.
It’s on value types, mutability, parameterless constructors and expectations of compiled code.
I’ve bitten myself in the foot with mutable types in too many languages too often, so I started advocating this years ago at clients, and now in this blog-post.
TL;DR:
Posted in .NET, C#, C++, Delphi, Development, Jon Skeet, Software Development | 2 Comments »
The Wiert Corner - irregular stream of stuff 