The Wiert Corner – irregular stream of stuff

Jeroen W. Pluimers on .NET, C#, Delphi, databases, and personal interests

  • My badges

    Mastodon

  • Twitter Updates

  • Pages

  • All categories

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,839 other subscribers

Archive for the ‘Software Development’ Category

« Previous Entries
Next Entries »

Delphi – Defer defines the “postpone procedure” pattern to execute code at the end of a method

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/09/06

Last year, I stumbled upon [WayBack] Defer defines the “postpone procedure” pattern, this postpone should schedule a “procedure: TProc” to run it after the end of the caller method… – Cesar Romero – Google+ that points to this repository:

https://github.com/cesarliws/foundation-4-delphi

Some people like this usage of the RAII pattern, but I do like it even though I do not use it very often. The implementation better than my TAnonymousMethodMemento in Delphi: a memento that executes any code at end of method for various reasons:

Now the documentation could use more English (some of it is in Portuguese).

–jeroen

Posted in Delphi, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

Some search links on Delphi and C# WSDL imports I need to investigate further

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/09/05

Sometimes, the Delphi WSDL importer imports fine, but the generated code does not accept test cases sent by other tools.

Below are some links for messages and comment fragments that I want to investigate further.

I have included the .NET message, because my experience is that searching on those gives more accurate results for something that could be broken in more than one environment.

Based on those:

Some on-line tools prefer the WSDL to be in one document, but a lot of WSDL documents use import and or include features, so here are some links on that too:

Bruneau Babet correctly informed me that – though Delphi SOAP clients support both document literal and RPC encoded – Delphi SOAP servers cannot support document literal, as they can only support RPC encoded. Through that I found

  • [WayBack] Apache CXF — WSDLValidator
    • Check the WSDL document for XML well-formedness.
    • Validate the WSDL document against its XML schema.
    • Validate the WSDL document using some of the semantic rules defined in the WSDL specification.
    • Validate the WSDL document against custom validation rules, such as those defined by the Web Services Interoperability (WS-I) organization (i.e. WS-I Basic Profile rules).
    • Validate the WSDL against strange exceptions, incorrectly generated code and general bad WSDL issues.

Back on those days, the big plan was to move everything Delphi to the .NET platform which supports both document literal and RPC encoded.

All in all, document literal has been on the radar with the Delphi R&D team since at least 2009, and nothing has been done.

References:

I looks like a wsdl message request part entries need to be named parameters for some tooling to correctly infer document/literal in a wrapped way. Some links for further research on this:

When you are surely running SOAP over HTTP, you can use this small class to raise exceptions which automatically get translated into SOAP Faults having the right return code using a trick I bumped into a few years ago from [WayBack] web services – Accessing the original TWebRequest object in a Delphi SOAP Server – Stack Overflow:

unit SoapFaultWithHttpCodeExceptionUnit;

interface

uses
  System.SysUtils;

type
  ESoapFaultWithHttpCodeException = class(Exception)
  strict private
    FHttpStatusCode: Integer;
  public
    constructor Create(const AHttpStatusCode: Integer);
    property HttpStatusCode: Integer read FHttpStatusCode;
  end;

implementation

uses
  Winapi.WinHTTP,
  Soap.WebBrokerSOAP,
  Web.HTTPApp,
  IdCustomHTTPServer;

constructor ESoapFaultWithHttpCodeException.Create(const AHttpStatusCode: Integer);
var
  IdHTTPResponseInfo: TIdHTTPResponseInfo;
  ReasonString: string;
  WebDispatcher: IWebDispatcherAccess;
begin
  IdHTTPResponseInfo := TIdHTTPResponseInfo.Create(nil, nil, nil);
  try
    FHttpStatusCode := AHttpStatusCode;
    IdHTTPResponseInfo.ResponseNo := AHttpStatusCode;
    ReasonString := Format('%d: %s', [AHttpStatusCode, IdHTTPResponseInfo.ResponseText]);
    inherited Create(ReasonString);

    // https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10405227/accessing-the-original-twebrequest-object-in-a-delphi-soap-server
    if Supports(GetSOAPWebModule, IWebDispatcherAccess, WebDispatcher) then
    begin
      WebDispatcher.Response.StatusCode := HTTP_STATUS_SERVER_ERROR;
      WebDispatcher.Response.ReasonString := ReasonString;
    end

  finally
    IdHTTPResponseInfo.Free;
  end;
end;

end.

—jeroen

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in .NET, C#, Conference Topics, Conferences, Delphi, Development, Event, SOAP/WebServices, Software Development, XML/XSD | Leave a Comment »

C#/JSON deep verify if object instances are equivalent

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/09/05

Some notes to verify object equivalence:

–jeroen

Posted in .NET, C#, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

RaiMan’s SikuliX: Automate what you see on a computer monitor

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/09/05

On my research list:

Automate what you see on a computer monitor

Source: [WayBack] RaiMan’s SikuliX

Repositories:

It is an evolution of [WayBack] Sikuli Script – Home that has an other fork that can be automated with PowerPoint slides:

I should play with it: [WayBack] SikuliX – QUICKSTART

Via: [WayBack] Any recommendations of automation tools for GUI testing.We tried AutoIT but it had some problems and way too technical… – Tommi Prami – Google+

–jeroen

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Agile, Development, OCR, Power User, Software Development, Tesseract, Testing | Leave a Comment »

c# – All possible array initialization syntaxes – Stack Overflow

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/09/04

Since I tend to forget in-line array expression: [Archive.is] c# – All possible array initialization syntaxes – Stack Overflow:

These are the current declaration and initialization methods for a simple array.
string[] array = new string[2]; // creates array of length 2, default values
string[] array = new string[] { "A", "B" }; // creates populated array of length 2
string[] array = { "A" , "B" }; // creates populated array of length 2
string[] array = new[] { "A", "B" }; // created populated array of length 2
…
Also note that in the declarations above, the first two could replace the string[] on the left with var (C# 3+), as the information on the right is enough to infer the proper type. The third line must be written as displayed, as array initialization syntax alone is not enough to satisfy the compiler’s demands. The fourth could also use inference. So if you’re into the whole brevity thing, the above could be written as
var array = new string[2]; // creates array of length 2, default values
var array = new string[] { "A", "B" }; // creates populated array of length 2
string[] array = { "A" , "B" }; // creates populated array of length 2
var array = new[] { "A", "B" }; // created populated array of length 2

–jeroen

Posted in .NET, C#, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

What are your favorite extension methods for C#? (codeplex.com/extensionoverflow) – Stack Overflow

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/09/04

From an archive a long time ago: by now this question is probably deleted because well Stack Overflow:

Explanations how they work: [WayBack] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4338333/object-how-top-most-base-class-got-method/4338509

The codeplex repository https://extensionoverflow.codeplex.com has been forked at https://github.com/devkhan/ExtensionOverflow

–jeroej

Posted in .NET, C#, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

How and when are variables referenced in Delphi’s anonymous methods captured? – Stack Overflow

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/09/04

Just found some notes from 2013 for my research list that are still relevant:

Note that if you are using Smart Pointers, use the ones that Spring4D implemented in 2015 named Shared/IShared<T>/TShared<T>, see [WayBack] Spring4D – Pascal Today and [WayBack2] Smart Pointers will be in Spring4D 1.2.

–jeroen

Posted in Delphi, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Delphi XE4, Delphi XE5, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

Plastic SCM command-line for merge and diff

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/09/03

Just in case I have Plastic SCM without Beyond Compare:

Merge

"C:\Program Files\PlasticSCM5\client\mergetool" -b="%TEMP%\baseFile-guid.pas" -bn="baseSymbolicName" -bh="baseHash" -s="%TEMP%\sourceFile-guid.pas" -sn="srcSymbolicName" -sh="srcHash" -d="...\destinationPath\destinationFile.pas" -dh="destinationHash" -a -r="%TEMP%\resultFile.pas" -t="text" -i="NotIgnore" -e="NONE" -m="forced" -re="NONE" --progress="progressDescription" --extrainfofile="%TEMP%\extraInfoFile.tmp"

Diff

To be done

aa

Merge help (takes about 10 seconds to start):

"C:\Program Files\PlasticSCM5\client\mergetool.exe" --help

---------------------------
Mergetool usage
---------------------------
Usage: mergetool [ | ]

    diffOptions:  []

    mergeOptions:   [] [[] [] ] [] []

        baseFile:            {-b | --base}= 
        baseSymbolicName:    {-bn | --basesymbolicname}=
        automatic:           -a | --automatic
        silent:              --silent
        resultFile:          {-r | --result}=
        mergeType:           {-m | --mergeresolutiontype}={onlyone | onlysrc | onlydst | try | forced}

    generalFiles:  []  []

        sourceFile:          {-s | --source}=
        srcSymbolicName:     {-sn | --srcsymbolicname}=
        destinationFile:     {-d | --destination}= 
        dstSymbolicName:     {-dn | --dstsymbolicname}=

    generalOptions: [] [] [] []

        defaultEncoding:     {-e | --encoding}={none |ascii | unicode | bigendian | utf7 | utf8}
        comparisonMethod:    {-i | --ignore}={none | eol | whitespaces | eol&whitespaces}
        fileType:            {-t | --filestype}={text/csharp | text/XML | text}
        resultEncoding:      {-re | --resultencoding}={none |ascii | unicode | bigendian | utf7 | utf8}
        progress:            {--progress}=progress string indicating the current progress, for example: Merging file 1/8
        extraInfoFile:       {--extrainfofile}=path to a file that contains extra info about the merge

    Remarks:
          
        -a | --automatic:    Tries to resolve the merge automatically.
                             If the merge can't be resolved automatically (requires user interaction), the merge tool is shown.
        --silent:            This option must be used combined with the --automatic option.
                             When a merge can't be resolved automatically, this option causes the tool to return immediately
                             with a non-zero exit code (no merge tool is shown).
                             If the tool was able to resolve the merge automatically, the program returns exit code 0.

    Examples:

        mergetool
        mergetool -s=file1.txt -d=file2.txt
        mergetool -s=file1.txt -b=file0.txt --destination=file2.txt
        mergetool --base=file0.txt -d=file2.txt --source=file1.txt --automatic --result=result.txt
        mergetool -b=file0.txt -s=file1.txt -d=file2.txt -a -r=result.txt -e=utf7 -i=eol -t=text/csharp -m=onlyone
---------------------------
OK   
---------------------------

The merge extraInfoFile.tmp has a syntax like this:

Source (cs:-#)
    relative-sourceFile from cs:-# created by userName on timeStamp
    Comments: Source changeset description

Base (cs:#)
    relative-baseFile from cs:#@/baseBranch by userName on timeStamp
    Comments: BO's + CRUDS 

Destination (cs:#)
    relative-destinationFile from cs@/destinationBranch created by userName on timeStamp
    Comments: Destination changeset description

Where each cs is a change set number.

–jeroen

Posted in Beyond Compare, Development, Encoding, PlasticSCM, Power User, Software Development, Source Code Management | Leave a Comment »

on the dB scales and audio

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/09/03

  • Double or twice the loudness = factor 2 means about 10 dB more sensed loudness level (psycho acoustic)
  • Double or twice the voltage = factor 2 means 6 dB more measured voltage level (sound pressure level)
  • Double or twice the power = factor 2 means 3 dB more calculated power level (sound intensity level)

Now that we’ve straightened that one out…

–jeroen

Source: [WayBack] Outdoor speaker met versterker ontworpen door tweaker haalt doel op Kickstarter – Beeld en geluid – Nieuws – Tweakers

Posted in Algorithms, Development, LifeHacker, Power User, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

The Delphi VCL comes to Oxygene

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/09/03

Interesting approach, which makes one more “cross platform VCL” from outside the Embarcadero pipeline [WayBack] The Delphi VCL comes to Oxygene:

Developers switching from Delphi to Oxygene are loving our “Delphi RTL” compatibility library, as it helps them move their code over to new platforms without having to embrace all the new APIs at once. With the new Elements 10 builds we shipped in the past couple of weeks,

CrossVCL (by KSDev, the former FMX architects) already brings VCL to Linux through the Embarcadero compilers; VCL for Oxygene brings it – through the Oxygene compilers – to WebAssembly first and later to Cocoa and WPF.

I wonder how Windows VCL compatible both approaches are.

Via [WayBack] https://blogs.remobjects.com/2018/08/30/the-delphi-vcl-comes-to-oxygene/ – Ondrej Kelle – Google+

–jeroen

Posted in Delphi, Development, Oxygene, Pascal, Software Development | 2 Comments »

« Previous Entries
Next Entries »