The Wiert Corner – irregular stream of stuff

Jeroen W. Pluimers on .NET, C#, Delphi, databases, and personal interests

  • My badges

  • Twitter Updates

  • My Flickr Stream

  • Pages

  • All categories

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,862 other subscribers

Archive for the ‘Delphi 2007’ Category

Delphi types that cannot be used for TypeInfo

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/03/03

When writing the Spring4D unit tests for GetTypeSize to include as many TTypeKind values, I came across a few types that either did not compile, or were not supported by TypeInfo. I listed them below as I could not find them in the documentation.

I included a test named Test_EnsureAllTTypeKindsCoveredByCallsTo_Test_GetTypeSize_ that verifies that all TTypeKind values except tkUnknown are covered. So future extensions of TTypeKind will make the tests fail.

As a side issue, I really wanted to know if tkUnknown could be emitted by the compiler. It can sort of, for instance by defining discontiguous enumerations, but are incompatible with TypeInfo as well.

Types that do not compile at all: Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Agile, Delphi, Delphi 2007, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi 8, Delphi x64, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Delphi XE4, Delphi XE5, Development, DUnit, Software Development, Unit Testing | 2 Comments »

Delphi: the Factory Pattern with virtual Create Constructors (via: What Design Patterns do you implement in common Delphi programming? – Stack Overflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/02/20

Delphi Component Design

Delphi Component Design

From long ago, but still very valid, as I recently had another question like “what design patterns does Delphi use?”.

The Delphi usage of patterns to make the VCL and your applications work is one of the reasons I like the Delphi Component Design: Danny Thorpe so much.
Do not let you scare by the book title: a lot of information in this book is much broader than designing components.
It is about why and how things are done in the RTL and VCL, and which patterns you can use yourself.

Try and git it while you can still get it. It is excellent, but rare to get as it has been out of print for a while.

Only a minority of the Delphi developers knows that every Delphi developer uses a Factory pattern (delphi.about.com has an example in “regular” Delphi), but then implemented using virtual Create constructors.

So: time to shed some light on that :-)

Virtual constructors are to classes like virtual methods are like object instances.

The whole idea of the factory pattern is that you decouple the logic that determines what kind (in this case “class”) of thing (in this case “object instance”) to create from the actual creation.

It works like this using virtual Create constructors:

TComponent has a virtual Create constructor so, which can be overridden by any descending class:

type
  TComponent = class(TPersistent, ...)
    constructor Create(AOwner: TComponent); virtual;
    ...
  end;

For instance the TDirectoryListBox.Create constructor overrides it:

type
  TDirectoryListBox = class(...)
    constructor Create(AOwner: TComponent); override;
    ...
  end;

You can store a class reference (the class analogy to an object instance reference) in a variable of type ‘class type’. For component classes, there is a predefined type TComponentClass in the Classes unit:

type
  TComponentClass = class of TComponent;

When you have a variable (or parameter) of type TComponentClass, you can do polymorphic construction, which is very very similar to the factory pattern:

var
  ClassToCreate: TComponentClass;

...

procedure SomeMethodInSomeUnit;
begin
  ClassToCreate := TButton;
end;

...

procedure AnotherMethodInAnotherUnit;
var
  CreatedComponent: TComponent;
begin
  CreatedComponent := ClassToCreate.Create(Application);
  ...
end;

The Delphi RTL uses this for instance here:

Result := TComponentClass(FindClass(ReadStr)).Create(nil);

and here:

// create another instance of this kind of grid
SubGrid := TCustomDBGrid(TComponentClass(Self.ClassType).Create(Self));

The first use in the Delphi RTL is how the whole creation process works of forms, datamodules, frames and components that are being read from a DFM file.

The form (datamodule/frame/…) classes actually have a (published) list of components that are on the form (datamodule/frame/…). That list includes for each component the instance name and the class reference.
When reading the DFM files, the Delphi RTL then:

  1. finds about the components instance name,
  2. uses that name to find the underlying class reference,
  3. then uses the class reference to dynamically create the correct object

A regular Delphi developer usually never sees that happen, but without it, the whole Delphi RAD experience would not exist.

Allen Bauer (the Chief Scientist at Embarcadero), wrote a short blog article about this topic as well.
There is also a SO question about where virtual constructors are being used.

Let me know if that was enough light on the virtual Create constructor topic :-)

–jeroen via: What Design Patterns do you implement in common Delphi programming? – Stack Overflow.

Posted in Delphi, Delphi 1, Delphi 2, Delphi 2005, Delphi 2006, Delphi 2007, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi 3, Delphi 4, Delphi 5, Delphi 6, Delphi 7, Delphi 8, Delphi x64, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Delphi XE4, Delphi XE5, Development, Software Development | Tagged: , | 4 Comments »

Delphi: `with` dos and dont’s (more of the latter though).

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/02/18

About a year ago, I wrote about Delphi: you should avoid the with statement as it makes your code less future proof. Then I already tweeted I would follow up. Time to do it now (:

Besides my first post, these links inspired me most:

Posts about the with statement usually cause a stir: people either like or dislike it with passion.

Starting with some history and examples, this posts lists a few DOs and DON’Ts when using the with statement, shows advantages and drawbacks, and shows you tools to eliminate with statements. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Borland Pascal, Delphi, Delphi 1, Delphi 2005, Delphi 2006, Delphi 2007, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi 3, Delphi 4, Delphi 5, Delphi 6, Delphi 7, Delphi 8, Delphi x64, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Delphi XE4, Development, Pascal, Software Development, Turbo Pascal, With statement | 9 Comments »

Do not share DCU files between projects (via: delphi – Compiler Directive IF and IFEND – Stack Overflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/02/13

Summary: Always try to avoid sharing .DCU files between projects.

I see a lot of projects at clients that do not have their individual DCU directories set (therefore having the DCU files in the same directory as the PAS files causing shared units to share the DCU files), or share DCU files among different projects.

Both are a very bad idea, as the compiler does not always understand when the DCU file does not match the combination of PAS file and compiler options.

The result is the occasional use of the DCU file in stead of the PAS file causing wrong code to be used, or wrong debugger information to be included.

Danny Thorpe phrased it on Stack Overflow: Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Borland Pascal, Delphi, Delphi 1, Delphi 2005, Delphi 2006, Delphi 2007, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi 3, Delphi 4, Delphi 5, Delphi 6, Delphi 7, Delphi 8, Delphi x64, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Delphi XE4, Development, FreePascal, Lazarus, Pascal, Turbo Pascal | 9 Comments »

delphi – With a class operator is an implicit typecast to itself allowed? – Stack Overflow

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/01/29

In the series “interesting stuff you can do with Implicit operators”: delphi – With a class operator is an implicit typecast to itself allowed? – Stack Overflow.

Be careful though, as Implicit assignment will allow more code paths to the compiler than you expect at first sight (:

–jeroen

Posted in Delphi, Delphi 2007, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Delphi XE4, Delphi XE5, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

DelphiSpec Library Announce « Роман.Янковский.me

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/12/22

Cool stuff: DelphiSpec library, inspired by Cucumber. It runs on top of DUnit.

via DelphiSpec Library Announce « Роман.Янковский.me.

A similar one in the .NET realm: SpecFlow – Pragmatic BDD for .NET.

–jeroen

Posted in .NET, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Delphi, Delphi 2005, Delphi 2006, Delphi 2007, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Delphi XE4, Delphi XE5, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

XOR swap/exchange: nowadays an almost extinct means to exchange two distinct variables of the same size

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/12/19

Almost a year ago, a thread on “premature Delphi optimization” came by on G+ about this code:

procedure ExchangeInteger(var AValue1, AValue2: Integer);
begin
  AValue1 := AValue1 xor AValue2;
  AValue2 := AValue1 xor AValue2;
  AValue1 := AValue1 xor AValue2;
end;

I don’t think that was premature optimization, just some code from an old fart that had already been programming in the era where processors had reasons to use it:

Back then, the only efficient way to exchange two variables of the same data type was using the XOR swap algorithm.

Nowadays you have more options, and this is where the fun in that thread began, which I will show in a minute.

First a bit of history

The XOR swap algorithm was widely known in the 80s of last century and before, especially because the 6502 processor (oh the days of LISA Assembler) was vastly popular, as was the Z80. Together, they powered the majority of the home computers in the 70s and 80s.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Borland Pascal, Delphi, Delphi 1, Delphi 2005, Delphi 2006, Delphi 2007, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi 3, Delphi 4, Delphi 5, Delphi 6, Delphi 7, Delphi 8, Delphi x64, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Development, History, Pascal, Software Development, Turbo Pascal, UCSD Pascal | 7 Comments »

Delphi postbuild events: interesting take by David Heffernan (via: Stack Overflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/12/12

StackOverflow user David Heffernan – Stack Overflow has an interesting take on Delphi postbuild events:

At the moment my actiona read:

if exist PostBuild.bat call PostBuild.bat $(Platform) $(Config) $(OutputDir)

And then the PostBuild.bat script calls a Python script so that I can write my scripts in a real language.

I actually impose the build actions in a shared option set that I reference from all of my projects. That way I enforce consistency and predictability.

I know others use tools like FinalBuilder but building is so important that I feel it’s worth my effort in rolling my own tooling.
– David Heffernan Feb 14 at 20:24

–jeroen

via: Delphi XE3: Problems with complex pre-build events – Stack Overflow.

Posted in Delphi, Delphi 2007, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

When the Delphi XE5 commandline compiler fails with `error F1026: File not found: ‘False.dpr’`

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/11/20

If you an error like below when compiling Delphi XE5 .dproj files using msbuild … then note the documentation for Debug information (Delphi) – RAD Studio. has not been updated yet as it still lists the values {$D+} or {$D-} {$DEBUGINFO ON} or {$DEBUGINFO OFF}.

(_PasCoreCompile target) -> C:\Program Files (x86)\Embarcadero\RAD Studio\12.0\Bin\CodeGear.Delphi.Targets(187,5): error F1026: File not found: 'False.dpr'

With Delphi XE5, you can specify 3 additional values: {$D1}{$D2} and {$D0}, or {$DEBUGINFO 1}{$DEBUGINFO 2} or {$DEBUGINFO 0}

In the msbuild .dproj files , the values are stored as DCC_DebugInformation elements. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Delphi, Delphi 2005, Delphi 2006, Delphi 2007, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Delphi XE4, Delphi XE5, Development, Missed Schedule, SocialMedia, Software Development, WordPress | 13 Comments »

Delphi – Direct3D and the wrong FPU state: Now() function returns a wrong value (via: StackOverflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/31

The question datetime – Delphi Now() function returns a wrong value – Stack Overflow is similar to my article Delphi – Michael Justin had strange floating point results when his 8087 FPU Control Word got hosed.

Good that stackoverflow user Anton Zhuchkov found out the cause himself: his answer indicates the Precision Control (and rounding) part of the FPU state got hosed by wrongly initializing the Direct3D device.

I edited his answer with some extra links to documentation.

Finally I’ve found the solution. I needed to specify the D3DCREATE_FPU_PRESERVE flag when creating a D3D device by D3D.CreateDevice.

Otherwise, without that flag, all floating point operations are performed with single precision. As the TDateTime is a simple Double, and Now() functions is consist of simple addition of date value to time value, it all get messed up by DirectX “smart” override.

Problem solved. It was a tricky one indeed. :)

–jeroen

via: datetime – Delphi Now() function returns a wrong value – Stack Overflow.

Posted in 8087, Algorithms, Delphi, Delphi 2005, Delphi 2006, Delphi 2007, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi 5, Delphi 6, Delphi 7, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Development, Floating point handling, Software Development | 2 Comments »