The Wiert Corner – irregular stream of stuff

Jeroen W. Pluimers on .NET, C#, Delphi, databases, and personal interests

  • My badges

    Mastodon

  • Twitter Updates

  • My Flickr Stream

    20140508-Delphi-2007--Project-Options--Cannot-Edit-Application-Title-HelpFile-Icon-Theming20140430-Fiddler-Filter-Actions-Button-Run-Filterset-now20140424-VMware-Fusion-6.0.3.-no-reclaimable
    More Photos

  • Pages

  • All categories

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,862 other subscribers

Archive for the ‘.NET 4.0’ Category

« Previous Entries
Next Entries »

.NET/C#: Some links on validation/guarding/checking

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/12/05

From my link archive:

–jeroen

Posted in .NET, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

Two ways of adding a classic .asmx WebService in .net 4+ using Visual Studio 2010 SP1 and up (via: Stack Overflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/11/27

As of Visual Studio 2010 SP1 (I think it was there in the original non-SP1 version of VS2010), Microsoft has hidden the addition of classic ASCX webservices as they favour WCF over ASPX (there are quite a few differences).

It is easy to workaround though as Stack Overflow users User Cyberherbalist and User Alejandro Martin have shown, with a little bit post-editing from me: Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in .NET, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, ASP.NET, C#, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, SOAP/WebServices, Software Development, Visual Studio 11, Visual Studio 2010, Visual Studio and tools | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: Getting volume free space from UNC path requires PInvoke of GetDiskFreeSpaceEx in Kernel32.dll

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/11/26

For some remote monitoring, I needed to get information on UNC paths.

Though suggested, you cannot do this using the System.IO.DriveInfo class (not through the constructor, nor through the VB.NET FileSystem way) as that is about drives, not UNC paths. The System.IO.DriveInfo constructor clearly indicates it doesn’t work with UNC paths. And if you still try, this is the error you will get:

System.ArgumentException was unhandled
HResult=-2147024809
Message=Object must be a root directory ("C:\") or a drive letter ("C").
Source=mscorlib
StackTrace:
at System.IO.DriveInfo..ctor(String driveName)

Same for WMI: that only works when the UNC path has already been mapped to a drive letter.

You could do with adding a temporary drive letter but since there is nothing as permanent as a temporary…

P/Invoke

The actual solution is based on calling Windows API functions using P/Invoke. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in .NET, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, CSV, Development, Missed Schedule, SocialMedia, Software Development, WordPress | Leave a Comment »

.net/C#: you can pass anoymous types to a generic method, but not return them as a method result

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/11/12

You can pass anonymous types to a method, if that method has a generic parameter type. I regularly use this to Resolving a parameter name at runtime using the Generic Type Cache technique described by Rinat Abdullin.

The other way around however is impossible, as return types cannot, as Alexander M. Batishchev writes in his StackOverflow answer:

You can’t.

You can only return object, or container of objects, e.g. IEnumerable

Jared Par does a bit more elaboration:

You cannot type any method in C# to be the explicit type of an anonymous types. They cannot be “named” so to speak and hence cannot appear in metadata signatures.

If you really want to return a value which is an anonymous type there are 2 options

  • Have the return type of the method be System.Object. You can then do evil casting hacks to get a typed value in another method. This is very fragile and I don’t recommend it.
  • Use a generic method and a type inference trick to get the return type correct. This would require a very interesting signature definition for your approach.

Anonymous types were not really meant to be passed around in this fashion. At the point you need to pass them around between your functions in this manner, you’re better off explicitly defining a type.

Bummer (:

–jeroen

via:

Posted in .NET, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: Fingerprinting a machine

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/11/05

For my link archive, thanks Alek Davis:

Just keep in mind that ID of the CPU is not always available.

By the way, what are you trying to accomplish? If you want to generate a unique key for a computer instance, check the Generating Unique Key (Finger Print) for a Computer for Licensing Purposes post by Sowkot Osman at Codeproject; it can give you some hints (also read comments).

–jeroen

via: .net – APIs in C# for grabbing CPU IDs and drive/volume serial – Stack Overflow.

Posted in .NET, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

Tables with SQL Server and .NET data types

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/23

Thanks StackOverflow users George Stocker for asking, Örjan Jämte and Sir Crispalot for answering.

Below is the SQL Server 2012 table, in which I added links to the various data types.

I also added two columns with linked references to the types from the  C# data types, C# Keywords, Reference Tables for Types (C# Reference) and Data Type Summary (Visual Basic).

One of the things I need to check is against the LINQ SQL-CLR Type Mapping.

It is very important to keep in mind that in SQL, each combination of precision and digits gets you a different decimal type, and all of them are different from the .NET decimal type. See for instance the answers on these questions:

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in .NET, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, Algorithms, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Database Development, Development, Floating point handling, Software Development, SQL Server, SQL Server 2005, SQL Server 2008, SQL Server 2008 R2, SQL Server 2012 | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: Type.IsSubclassOf Method versus Type.IsAssignableFrom

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/22

Every once in a while, you will have to do is checks using reflection.

Basically there are two methods:

Thanks to Ani and Werner Beroux for explaining the difference in more detail on StackOverflow, I added some extra links:

To check for assignability, you can use the Type.IsAssignableFrom method:

typeof(SomeType).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(Derived))

This will work as you expect for

but not when you are looking for ‘assignability’ across explicit / implicit conversion operators.

To check for strict inheritance, you can use Type.IsSubclassOf:

typeof(Derived).IsSubclassOf(typeof(SomeType))

–jeroen

via: c# – How to check if a class inherits another class without instantiating it? – Stack Overflow.

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: check for exact type: simple things are always a good solution (via: Stack Overflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/17

A while ago, I bumped into a situation where someone had tried to solve the problem below with a convoluted reflection based solution for this seemingly simple problem:

class A {}
class B : A {}
B b = new B();
if(b is A) // this should return false

And indeed the solution is simple: replace the “b is a” with this:

b.GetType() == typeof(A)

Thanks StackOverflow users ChaosPandion and John K.

–jeroen

via c# check for exact type – Stack Overflow.

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

A small table that shows differences between decimal, double and float (Single)

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/16

Though you programmers all should have read What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic.

But I know you don’t, so below is a small difference on which floating point comparisons fail when using float (f, Single), double (d) and decimal (m, money) values in C#:

0.1 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.3 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.7 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.5 fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.9 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none

The can help you decide what kind of floating point type you want to use, for instance to answer c# – When should I use double instead of decimal? – Stack Overflow.

I specifically choose the values 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 0.9 to stress the difference between binary and decimal representations. Apart from the decimal type, you cannot store these decimal values in a binary representation. You can see the decimal representation for a double using the DoubleConverter class (thanks Jon Skeet!)

If you are have a problem that isn’t suite for floating point, then don’t use it. Use rational types, IntX, BigInteger or Complex from the System.Numerics namespace, or arbitraty precision floating point numbers.

The failing methods are part of a bigger DecimalDoubleSingleTestProject, for which you will find the source at BeSharp.net repository (you can browse the sources, and access it through SVN and TFS).

That project contains more checks (see the table at the end which includes 0.100000000001 and 0.1222222222222222222221 based on the accuracy you can get with float/double/decimal) and the failing/succeeding methods are the same.

This is what the failing fd_cast_none, fd_cast_up, fm_cast_none and dm_cast_none methods do:

//...
    [TestClass]
    public class UnitTestBase
    {
        protected float f { get; private set; }
        protected double d { get; private set; }
        protected decimal m { get; private set; }
//...
        public void TestMethod_fd_cast_none()
        {
                Assert.AreEqual(f, d);
        }
//...
        public void TestMethod_fd_cast_up()
        {
                Assert.AreEqual((double)f, d);
        }
//...
        public void TestMethod_fm_cast_none()
        {
                Assert.AreEqual(f, m);
        }
//...
        public void TestMethod_dm_cast_none()
        {
                Assert.AreEqual(d, m);
        }
    }

The methods seem to succeed, but that is just the deceiving part: when you carefully select the values you compare, all checks will eventually fail.

The table at the end shows some more literals that fail other tests. It is caused by all these types have different storage formats.

<h3>Conclusion</h3>

When comparing floating point literals, make sure they are of the same type, and select the type according to what precision or representation features you need.

Note this gets even worse when you start calculating with floating points. You will almost always loose accuracy, watch rounding errors and you cannot even do direct AreEqual comparisons any more. Read the articles by Eric Lippert tagged floating+point+arithmetic – Fabulous Adventures In Coding.

--jeroen

Full table:

0.1 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.3 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.5 fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.7 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.9 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.100000000001 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none
0.300000000003 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none
0.500000000005 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none
0.700000000007 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none
0.900000000009 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none
0.1222222222222222222221 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
0.3222222222222222222223 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
0.5222222222222222222225 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
0.7222222222222222222227 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_down dm_cast_up
0.9222222222222222222229 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
144444444444444444444.1 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_down dm_cast_up
344444444444444444444.3 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
544444444444444444444.5 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
744444444444444444444.7 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
944444444444444444444.9 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, Algorithms, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Floating point handling, Jon Skeet, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: suffixes for compiler number literals (via: Stack Overflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/15

A long while I avoided using suffixes to force the C# compiler into a specific type and – like Marc Gravell – used type-catst like (decimal)3.1415. I found out the hardway: it doesn’t work all the time.

(decimal)1.000000000000001 evaluates to 1 whereas
1.000000000000001m evaluates to 1.000000000000001.
In the former case, the computer parses the literal as a double and then casts it to a decimal. – Joe Albahari Apr 15 ’11 at 6:02

My main reason for using the casts was that I kept forgetting the suffixes needed to force a literal to be of a specific type. Hence this post.

The suffixes and casts are not limited to use in consts: any place where a numeric literal is used, you can use a suffix to force a compile time type.

Though documented in sections 2.4.4.2 Integer literals (C#) and 2.4.4.3 Real literals (C#) of the C# standard and appendix C. Grammar (C#). That standard does not contain a comprehensive list, much after I wrote this post I found Value Types Table (C# Reference).

This post only lists the C# suffixes. Abel Braaksma published a blog entry Overview of type suffixes in C# and VB.Net.

StackOverflow user  sixlettervariables has this (slightly) edited list:

var y = 0f; // y is single/float
var z = 0d; // z is double
var r = 0m; // r is decimal
var i = 0U; // i is unsigned int
var j = 0L; // j is long (note capital L for clarity)
var k = 0UL; // k is unsigned long (note capital L for clarity)

Some more background info: Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, Algorithms, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Floating point handling, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

« Previous Entries
Next Entries »