The Wiert Corner – irregular stream of stuff

Jeroen W. Pluimers on .NET, C#, Delphi, databases, and personal interests

  • My badges

  • Twitter Updates

  • My Flickr Stream

  • Pages

  • All categories

  • Email Subscription

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 717 other subscribers

Archive for December 8th, 2020

Tables with two headers • Tables • WAI Web Accessibility Tutorials

Posted by jpluimers on 2020/12/08

Since I always forget that you can have any cell marked as th to make it a header: [WayBack] Tables with two headers • Tables • WAI Web Accessibility Tutorials.

This is not just limited to top rows, you can use it any where:

  • in the left column
  • in any other row
  • in any other column
  • in individual cells

In addition, a table can also have a caption, which is not just useful for screen-readers: it benefits general readability.

Quoting the page:

For such tables, use the <th> element to identify the header cells and the scope attribute to declare the direction of each header. The scopeattribute can be set to row or col to denote that a header applies to the entire row or column, respectively.

Additionally, you can use the <caption> element to identify the table in a document. This is particularly useful for screen-reader users browsing the web page in “table mode” where they can navigate from table to table.

Examples on that page:

–jeroen

Posted in Development, HTML, HTML5, Software Development, Web Development | Leave a Comment »

WSA: Web-Service Addressing

Posted by jpluimers on 2020/12/08

I don’t do SOAP that often any more, so here some links on it and some notes on how one site used some of the fields:

A few observations from real life:

  • Inside the WS-Addressing realm:
    • Action has a URI indicating what to execute inside the service
    • From is basically abused because it
      1. is not used as a source endpoint but
      2. has an Address element that contains both Action and authentication
    • MessageID uses a uuid: based URI
  • Outside the WS-Addressing realm, in the main SOAP body:
    • Since is implemented using a non ISO-8601 compliant timestamp: it barfs on the second fraction and on the time zone (neither Z nor an offset based time-zone are accepted).

I did not know you could have uuid based URIs, as they are not mentioned here:

But apparently they have been in use for quite a while:

–jeroen

Posted in Development, SOAP/WebServices, Software Development, XML, XML/XSD | Leave a Comment »

delphi “tproc” with “array of const” – Google Search

Posted by jpluimers on 2020/12/08

Reminder to self: remember which of the open source libraries have:

  • a generic TProc<T> alike with an const values: array of const T parameter
  • a generic TProc<T> alike with a const value: T parameter

Google returned none that stuck:

The Delphi RTL does not contain them, and because they forgot setting them up with const parameters, these can never be changed:

[WayBack] System.SysUtils.TProc – RAD Studio API Documentation

TProc = reference to procedure;
TProc<T> = reference to procedure (Arg1: T);
TProc<T1,T2> = reference to procedure (Arg1: T1; Arg2: T2);
TProc<T1,T2,T3> = reference to procedure (Arg1: T1; Arg2: T2; Arg3: T3);
TProc<T1,T2,T3,T4> = reference to procedure (Arg1: T1; Arg2: T2; Arg3: T3; Arg4: T4);

More people are annoyed by this, for instance [WayBack] SysUtils.pas Why parameters of these anonymous not const? TProc = reference to procedure (Arg1: T1; Arg2: T2); TProc = reference … – Jacek Laskowski – Google+

SysUtils.pas

Why parameters of these anonymous not const?

TProc<T1,T2> = reference to procedure (Arg1: T1; Arg2: T2);
TProc<T1,T2,T3> = reference to procedure (Arg1: T1; Arg2: T2; Arg3: T3);
TFunc<T,TResult> = reference to function (Arg1: T): TResult;
TFunc<T1,T2,TResult> = reference to function (Arg1: T1; Arg2: T2): TResult;

  • David Heffernan's profile photo
    Because the designer made a bloody terrible mistake 
  • Asbjørn Heid's profile photo
    To be fair, const-ness is a bloody mess in Delphi…
  • Hallvard Vassbotn's profile photo
    It could have been solved if the const’ness had been seen as a implementation detail by the compiler (which it really is) and made const and non-const signatures assignment compatible.
  • David Heffernan's profile photo
    +Hallvard Vassbotn indeed, and it pains me that this has never happened
  • Hallvard Vassbotn's profile photo
    +Marco Cantu Any chance of a compiler improvement in the future with regards to relaxing const matching in signature assignments…? :)
  • Vincent Parrett's profile photo
    I’ve taken to defining
    TConstProc<T1,T2> = reference to procedure (const Arg1: T1; const Arg2: T2);for cases where I have full control.

  • David Heffernan's profile photo
    +Vincent Parrett I’m sure we all have our own versions of this. But it’s not much use for composition of course.
  • Vincent Parrett's profile photo
    +David Heffernan Yup. Since it’s unlikely the compiler will every be updated to make const an automatic thing, perhaps they could add const versions to the RTL.
  • Allen Drennan's profile photo
    Yeah, we end up making our own versions of these to add the consts in all our projects.
  • David Millington's profile photo
    Do file a QP, please. Major releases like the upcoming 10.3 are the time to make interface-breaking changes.

–jeroen

Posted in Delphi, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »