The Wiert Corner – irregular stream of stuff

Jeroen W. Pluimers on .NET, C#, Delphi, databases, and personal interests

  • My badges

  • Twitter Updates

  • My Flickr Stream

  • Pages

  • All categories

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,994 other followers

VB.NET: If you want to cast use DirectCast or TryCast; if you want to convert, use CType

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/07/03

I’ve done quite a bit of VB.NET maintenance lately.

Most of that code was riddled with CType, both for conversions and casts. Quite a bit code had Option Explicit and Option Strict Off. A lot of those CType constructions had empty Try / Catch / End Try blocks around them.

Those empty catch blocks are a code smell. They pretend to be able to survive any exceptional disaster, but in practice you can’t. You have to indicate what kinds of disasters you can handle, for instance if a meteorite hits your data center (thanks George Stocker).

Turning off Option Strict can be OK under many circumstances (the default is off), but having Option Explicit off is usually a code smell as well, just like On Error Resume Next (which was also in plenty of the source code).

I do understand a lot of VB.NET source comes from people having programmed in VB 6, VBScript or VBA for a long time where those constructs were more common. But writing code in the 21st century is much more about writing code that you can prove to be right. Having proper error handling and compiler type checking is a big part of that.

It pays to go with the idiom, for example read the good and bad ways of – Safest way to check for integer.

Back to CType: basically you have do distinguish between conversions and casts. The reason is that when you know it will be a form of cast, CType is way to expensive. And if you know you will be doing conversions, than casting is not what you want.


When performing casts from a reference to a type, you have these options (both of which are way cheaper than CType):


For conversions, there are more options:

Thou you can have Fun With Dynamic Objects (Doug Rothaus), when using Dynamic Objects, conversion gets a lot trickier. Be prepared to research more into these areas:

Additional reading

This article was about VB.NET specific code smells. There are more generic ones, as you can write crappy code in any environment. Just read some of Coding Horror: Code Smells to get a feel for it.

If you want to get rid of On Error Resume Next, read what Tim Medora has answered to What is the best alternative “On Error Resume Next” (especially the part about logging exceptions).

Did I already mention that Empty Try Catch blocks are a bad idea?

Since more than a decade, the CType/DirectCast topic has come up on many sites and forums.

A few interesting posts and abstracts:

I like the summary table by Thorsten(kaefer) over various languages mentioned in his Swamp answer:

I would like to see a discussion on the differences, advantages, and different situations in which each of these are best used within the context of .NET programming for Autocad.

CType is the odd one out, since it performs some dark magic outside of the CLR, and can be used to emulate Option Strict Off. An older article on msdn discusses this, under “Conversion Functions, CType, DirectCast, and System.Convert”.

As for the others, it should be pretty straightforward to map type conversions between .NET languages.

upcast, inheritance or implementation required, can’t fail DirectCast (<type>) :> or upcast
downcast, inheritance or implementation required, may throw InvalidCastException DirectCast (<type>) :?> or downcast
conversion, inheritance or implementation required, may return null TryCast as <type>
type test TypeOf is <type> :?
type conversion functions CInt, CDbl etc. int, float etc.

I’m not quite sure how conversions to and from System.Object (boxing/unboxing) fit into this picture.

Cheers, Thorsten


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: