The Wiert Corner – irregular stream of stuff

Jeroen W. Pluimers on .NET, C#, Delphi, databases, and personal interests

  • My badges

  • Twitter Updates

  • My Flickr Stream

  • Pages

  • All categories

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,861 other subscribers

Archive for the ‘C# 1.0’ Category

.NET/C#: Ctrl+R+R toggles wrap in Visual Studio.NET 2003 (via: Stack Overflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/05/14

A while ago, I had to do some emergency fixing in Visual Studio .NET 2003 as – despite it is unsupported – a client was still using it.

By habit, I tried to rename a variable using the Ctrl+R+R shortcut for Refactor Rename. It didn’t work, and I was not surprised: this refactoring was introduced in Visual Studio 2005.

A while later, I started to notice that WordWrap was turned on in the code editor.

It took me a few minutes and a quick search to find out the two are related:

Visual studio 2003: ctrl+R+R is the shortcut to toggle WordWrap in the code editor.

Thanks Micah for answering that!

–jeroen

via How can I toggle word wrap in Visual Studio.NET? – Stack Overflow.

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, C#, C# 1.0, Development, Software Development, Visual Studio 2003, Visual Studio and tools | Leave a Comment »

.NET uses banker’s rounding as default as it follows IEEE 754 (via: Stack Overflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/05/08

It is almost 3 years that Ostemar wrote an interesting answer on Stack Overflow to the question

Why does .NET use banker’s rounding as default? – Stack Overflow.

Few people (even many programmers don’t!) know about rounding and how it can influence software, let alone what bankers rounding does so lets set a few things straight first.

Rounding matters. Depending on the kinds of software you write, it matters a little, or a lot.

For instance, in these categories, it can matter an awful lot:

  • Financial applications
  • Statistical applications

Bankers rounding means rounding half even. Which means that #.5 will round to the even number closest to #.

In bankers rounding, 1.5 rounds to 2, 3.5 to 4 as does 4.5, -1.5 rounds to -2, -3.5 to -4 as does -4.5.

This is called “unbiased” because for reasonable distributions of y values, the expected (average) value of the rounded numbers is the same as that of the original numbers.

This is contrary to what the majority of people are accustomed to: Round half away from zero is taught in most countries (even for the Dutch, despite the alias “Dutch Rounding” for round half to even).

Round half away from zero rounds 1.5 rounds to 2, 3.5 to 4 and 4.5 to 5. Negative numbers round like this: -1.5 rounds to -2, -3.5 to -4 as does -4.5 to -5.

This is only free of overall bias if the original numbers are positive or negative with equal probability.

In short, .NET uses bankers rounding because it follows the IEEE 754 rounding rules.

This was his answer: Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, .NET CF, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | 3 Comments »

Podcast 106: Shipping | iDeveloper; about RemObjects C# and a lot of other stuff

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/03/13

Listen to Podcast 106: Shipping | iDeveloper.

A few notes:

  • RemObjects C# on iOS is based on LLVM, so I assume the other platforms use that too.
  • Both guys are really busy shipping stuff, and it is hard.

–jeroen

Posted in .NET, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, RemObjects C#, Software Development | 2 Comments »

UINavigationController video when using Oxygene or Hydrogene Remobjects C# (via: remobjects)

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/03/07

Nice video when using either of the RemObjects Elements (Oxygene or Hydrogene): for creating a UI UINavigationController – remobjects.

–jeroen

Posted in .NET, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Oxygene, Pascal, RemObjects C#, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: DBNull explained

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/02/11

The DBNull type is a very special type in .NET. It represents null values in databases, which are slightly different than null values in .NET.

The biggest confusion that people have with it is that it won’t convert to anything. Which means that you see a lot of questions like “System.InvalidCastException: Conversion from type ‘DBNull’ to type” “is not valid”.

You’d think the full name would be System.Data.DBNull, it is actually named System.DBNull. The reason is that various other functionality of the System namespace depend on it, for instance the System.Convert class.

DBNull was already present in .NET 1.x, so it predates nullable types that were introduced in C# 2 / .NET 2.

A null value on the database side will result in a DBNull instance.

If you want to explicitly pass a null value to a database, you use a DBNull.Value, which is a singleton.

Why DBNull

There is a very interestin question/answer series on StackOverflow about this: via .net – What is the point of DBNull? – Stack Overflow.

There are a few good arguments both for and against DBNull.

But the baseline is that DBNull predates the introduction in the .NET framework of genuine nullable types. Both their behaviour is slightly different, so DBNull had to stay.

Which means you have to deal with it every now and then.

Invalid casts

A bit more background on the invalid casts.

It is thrown like this:

            throw new InvalidCastException(Environment.GetResourceString("InvalidCast_DBNull"));

from

Convert.DefaultToType();

which is called from the DBNull method

    object IConvertible.ToType(Type type, IFormatProvider provider);

All other IConvertible methods are implementated like

bool IConvertible.ToBoolean(IFormatProvider provider)
{
    throw new InvalidCastException(Environment.GetResourceString("InvalidCast_FromDBNull"));
}

So these all throw the same exception:

    bool IConvertible.ToBoolean(IFormatProvider provider);
    byte IConvertible.ToByte(IFormatProvider provider);
    char IConvertible.ToChar(IFormatProvider provider);
    DateTime IConvertible.ToDateTime(IFormatProvider provider);
    decimal IConvertible.ToDecimal(IFormatProvider provider);
    double IConvertible.ToDouble(IFormatProvider provider);
    short IConvertible.ToInt16(IFormatProvider provider);
    int IConvertible.ToInt32(IFormatProvider provider);
    long IConvertible.ToInt64(IFormatProvider provider);
    sbyte IConvertible.ToSByte(IFormatProvider provider);
    float IConvertible.ToSingle(IFormatProvider provider);
    ushort IConvertible.ToUInt16(IFormatProvider provider);
    uint IConvertible.ToUInt32(IFormatProvider provider);
    ulong IConvertible.ToUInt64(IFormatProvider provider);

–jeroen

via:

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: When XmlSerializer throws “Unable to generate a temporary class (result=1).” / “error CS2001”

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/02/06

A while ago, I had this error when running an application on a hardened server:

Unhandled Exception:System.InvalidOperationException:
Unable to generate a temporary class (result=1).
error CS2001: Source file 'C:\windows\TEMP\0hocq2nq.0.cs' could not be found  error CS2008: No inputs specified
at System.Xml.Serialization.Compiler.Compile(Assembly parent, String ns, XmlSerializerCompilerParameters xmlParameters, Evidence evidence)
at System.Xml.Serialization.TempAssembly.GenerateAssembly(XmlMapping[] xmlMappings, Type[] types, String defaultNamespace, Evidence evidence, XmlSerializerCompilerParameters parameters, Assembly assembly, Hashtable assemblies)
at System.Xml.Serialization.TempAssembly..ctor(XmlMapping[] xmlMappings, Type[] types, String defaultNamespace, String location, Evidence evidence)
at System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer..ctor(Type type, XmlAttributeOverrides overrides, Type[] extraTypes, XmlRootAttribute root, String defaultNamespace, String location, Evidence evidence)
at System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer..ctor(Type type, XmlAttributeOverrides overrides, Type[] extraTypes, XmlRootAttribute root, String defaultNamespace, String location)
at System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer..ctor(Type type, Type[] extraTypes)

Usually I’m not the first with strange errors, but searching for “Unhandled Exception:System.InvalidOperationException: Unable to generate a temporary class” didn’t get many results.

This was a program running from SSIS under a non-system domain account with very little access.

My first guess was the right now: the XmlSerializer wants to generate a temporary C# file, then compile it into a temporary assembly. Since it cannot generate the C# file because the account does not have access to %windir\TEMP%, the compiler cannot find the (not generated) C# file.

After a few tries, I searched for XmlSerializer without GenerateAssembly, where the first hit ended at Changing where XmlSerializer Outputs Temporary Assemblies – Scott Hanselman.

That post indicated I should try looking for tempFilesLocation in the XmlSerializer context.

That got me these posts: Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#/VB.NET – Default value for generics (via: Stack Overflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/02/05

Looking for the pesky little differences between C# and VB.NET, I stumbled over this nice question by Micah Martin on default values for generics in VB.NET as compared to C#. Actually there were 3 questions, so I did a bit of post-editing:

How do I create the default for a generic in VB.NET? in C# I can call:
T variable = default(T);

  1. How do I do this in VB?
  2. If this just returns null (C#) or nothing (VB.NET) then what happens to value types?
  3. Is there a way to specify for a custom type what the default value is? For instance what if I want the default value to be the equivalent to calling a parameterless constructor on my class.

User Konrad Rudolph – Stack Overflow. promptly gave three answers:

Question 1:

Dim variable As T ‘ or ‘ Dim variable As T = Nothing ‘ or ‘ Dim variable As New T() Notice that the latter only works if you specifiy either the New or the Structure constraint for the generic type.

Question 2:

For value types all members of the struct are “nulled” out, i.e. all reference type members are set to null (Nothing) and all value types are in turn nulled out. And no, since string is a reference type, it does not result in "" for strings as suggested in the other answer.

Question 3:

No, there’s no way to specify this. There are some threads about this on Stack Overflow already, e.g. here. Jon has posted an excellent explanation why this is.

–jeroen

via: c# – Default value for generics – Stack Overflow.

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development, VB.NET, VB.NET 10.0, VB.NET 11.0, VB.NET 7.0, VB.NET 7.1, VB.NET 8.0, VB.NET 9.0 | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: refactoring some C# 1 code that uses HashTables as a poor mans property bag (via:Stack Overflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/01/30

A while ago, I was refactoring some C# 1 code that uses HashTables as a poor mans property bag.

The problem was that I felt my code was convoluted, and should be denser, especially avoiding Convert.ChangeType. My code was already much simpler than casting tuples to a superclass.

So I asked this question on StackOverflow: c# – Is there a solution that feels less clumsy than Convert.ChangeType to get the value from a HashTable – Stack Overflow.

User dasblinkenlight showed it could be shortened and explained why (hyperlinks are mine):

Since System.String is sealed, the expression

genericType.IsSubclassOf(stringType)

is the same as

genericType == stringType

Therefore you do not need a call of Convert.ChangeType: you can cast to T by casting to object, like this:

object stringResult; // Note the change of type to "object"
if (haveValue)
    stringResult = ((string)properties[propertyName]).Trim();
else
    stringResult = string.Empty;
result = (T)stringResult; // It is allowed to cast object to generic T

The original .NET 1.1 code had loads of null checks wrapped if/then/else statements to assign default values for null values.
I wanted to get rid of that, and get code like this: Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: fun with enums and aliases part 2

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/01/29

In the .NET/C#: fun with enums and aliases part 1 you saw that an enumerated type can specify an underlying type.

The underlying type is limited to a strict set of built-in C# types: , so you cannot use a CTS type for it.

So you might think that you can only define enumeration values by integer constant like this:

namespace BeSharp
{
    enum TwoState
    {
        False = 0,
        True = 1,
    }
    enum ThreeState
    {
        False = 0,
        True = 1,
        Unknown = -1,
    }
}

Well, you can do it like this too, since Operations between different enum types are allowed in another enum declaration: Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

Faking num lock, caps lock and scroll lock leds – About My Code

Posted by jpluimers on 2014/01/21

I remember doing this in DOS ages ago (in the Turbo Pascal 5 era) for exactly the same reason: flash the keyboard LEDs to indicate some event was happening, but I’ve yet to find back the source code.

Here is how to do it in Windows using either C# or C: Faking num lock, caps lock and scroll lock leds – About My Code.

–jeroen

via: c# – Way to turn on keyboard’s caps-lock light without actually turning on caps-lock? – Stack Overflow.

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, C++, Development, Pascal, Software Development, Turbo Pascal | Leave a Comment »