Posted by jpluimers on 2013/01/24
During code reviews, I often see people do things like this:
if (!Directory.Exists(directoryPath))
Directory.CreateDirectory(directoryPath);
or this:
DirectoryInfo directoryInfo = new DirectoryInfo(directoryPath);
if (!directoryInfo.Exists)
directoryInfo.Create();
You don’t need the if statements here. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | 1 Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2013/01/23
A while ago I found myself in .NET Assembly hell.
I inherited a bunch of interdependent .NET projects with no clear build instructions that were halfway ported between .NET 1.x and 4.x had various binaries here and there, a mix of of imported Office COM libraries and PIAs, links to various source code and binary versions 3rd party libraries like Microsoft Enterprise Library (which is very unforgiving when you get configuration wrong, and – because it uses dynamic loading and the version used was from before MEF – is painfully hard to track down wrong types and assemblies).
Basically the right assemblies got into the wrong places, the wrong assemblies in the right places, and a version mix up all over the place.
All in all it was a mess, and I was in .NET assembly hell.
It was a tedious and painful process to solve, so below are a few tips, links to posts and tools that helped me getting this solved. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 4.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2013/01/22
I normally don’t do much VBScript stuff, but sometimes I have to, and these tips helped me big time:
–jeroen
This was the script in question (mimicked a bit after Prnmngr.vbs): Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Development, Scripting, Software Development, VBScript, Visual Studio 11, Visual Studio 2005, Visual Studio 2008, Visual Studio 2010, Visual Studio and tools | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2013/01/17
Too bad the new StackOverflow rules actively discourage the kind of open questions like “c# – What are your thoughts on Raven DB?“.
They are being closed as “not constructive by casperOne♦ Nov 29 ’11 at 5:25”, which is a shame as these kinds of questions often reveal very valuable and balanced answers.
Right now I’m resarching what RavenDB could mean for storing documents. And yes, I know about the RavenDB licensing model: free for open source, pay for commercial use.
–jeroen
via: c# – What are your thoughts on Raven DB? – Stack Overflow.
Posted in .NET, C#, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Database Development, Development, Pingback, Software Development, Stackoverflow | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2013/01/16
Thanks to Danny Thorpe and John Skeet, I learned something about C# initialization order.
I knew there were differences between declarations having their initial value set at the point of declaration, and inside a constructor, but not about all of them.
So I observed the initialization order while stepping through code, but the virtual method behaviour was new to me.
Thanks Blaz Art for asking this at SO.
Posted in .NET, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Jon Skeet, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2013/01/15
For my link archive:
use the EntityConnectionStringBuilder see this How to: Build an EntityConnection Connection String.
–jeroen
Posted in .NET, .NET ORM, C#, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, EF Entity Framework, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2013/01/10
In the .NET 1.x past, the WinForms designers in Visual Studio .NET and Visual Studio 2003 would put the C# or VB.NET code containing the form code as the InitializeComponent method of the top most class monolithic C# and VB.NET files that also contain the user code (for events and such).
As of Visual Studio 2005 (actually: Whidbey and higher), this code is based on partial classes. For each form (actually designable entity, but lets limit this to WinForms forms) you get a MyForm.cs and MyForm.Designer.cs
As a side note, with a bit of effort, you can generate the Windows Form Designer generated code yourself as this answer shows. This is for instance convenient when you have form definitions in a different technology and want to convert it to WinForms, WPF or another form of designer based .NET code.
I long time ago I wrote a short manual for co-workers on converting the monolithic files (for people interested, it is below).
Since then I found a couple of very interesting links: Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development, Visual Studio 11, Visual Studio 2002, Visual Studio 2003, Visual Studio 2005, Visual Studio 2008, Visual Studio 2010, Visual Studio and tools, WinForms | 1 Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2013/01/09
Until I realized that comparing two IEnumerables needed some extra thought, I wondered why Assert.AreEqual would not support them.
jrista pointed me in the right direction answering a question about c# – How does Assert.AreEqual determine equality between two generic IEnumerables?
The correct answer is “it doesn’t”, but that is really dense.
IEnumerables are just that: being generic or normal, they allow you to enumerate things. They can get you an enumerator (generic or not) that has a notion of Current (generic or normal) and such, but no knowledge of the underlying data.
Comparing them needs you to think about the enumeration and the underlying data at the same time. You can get two kinds of comparisons: Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in .NET, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2013/01/08
When developing in multiple languages, it sometimes is funny to see how they differ in compiler oddities.
Below are a few on const examples.
Basically, in C# you cannot go from a char const to a string const, and chars are a special kind of int.
In Delphi you cannot go from a string to a char. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in .NET, ASCII, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Delphi, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Development, Encoding, Software Development, Unicode | Leave a Comment »
Posted by jpluimers on 2013/01/03
You’d hope that a method like Wordify with the signature below would be simple right?
public static string Wordify(string pascalCaseString)
Not so. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in .NET, C#, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | 1 Comment »
The Wiert Corner - irregular stream of stuff 