The Wiert Corner – irregular stream of stuff

Jeroen W. Pluimers on .NET, C#, Delphi, databases, and personal interests

  • My badges

    Mastodon

  • Twitter Updates

  • My Flickr Stream

    20140508-Delphi-2007--Project-Options--Cannot-Edit-Application-Title-HelpFile-Icon-Theming20140430-Fiddler-Filter-Actions-Button-Run-Filterset-now20140424-VMware-Fusion-6.0.3.-no-reclaimable
    More Photos

  • Pages

  • All categories

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,839 other subscribers

Archive for the ‘Software Development’ Category

« Previous Entries
Next Entries »

fun to read: blog of a reverse engineering team member

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/11/06

A while ago, I came across this blog: Levis’s Little Blog about Reverse Code Engineering (RCE) | All about Reverse Code Engineering.

It is of a beginning reverse engineering guy, doing reverse engineering of parts of application code, and being part of a REPT scene publishing key generators and crackers of software.

I think the interesting part is not so much his skill level, but has these aspects:

  • his choice of tools and how he develops skills tells you much about the scene and how they work
  • examining the keygens, cracks, etc, tells you a lot about how well the software is that we write
  • the abundance of people like him and the available tools basically void every copy protection scheme you can imagine

Part of his toolset are come from a few video tutorials he posted about, where this is in the context menu of a .EXE file: Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: Fingerprinting a machine

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/11/05

For my link archive, thanks Alek Davis:

Just keep in mind that ID of the CPU is not always available.

By the way, what are you trying to accomplish? If you want to generate a unique key for a computer instance, check the Generating Unique Key (Finger Print) for a Computer for Licensing Purposes post by Sowkot Osman at Codeproject; it can give you some hints (also read comments).

–jeroen

via: .net – APIs in C# for grabbing CPU IDs and drive/volume serial – Stack Overflow.

Posted in .NET, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

Delphi – Direct3D and the wrong FPU state: Now() function returns a wrong value (via: StackOverflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/31

The question datetime – Delphi Now() function returns a wrong value – Stack Overflow is similar to my article Delphi – Michael Justin had strange floating point results when his 8087 FPU Control Word got hosed.

Good that stackoverflow user Anton Zhuchkov found out the cause himself: his answer indicates the Precision Control (and rounding) part of the FPU state got hosed by wrongly initializing the Direct3D device.

I edited his answer with some extra links to documentation.

Finally I’ve found the solution. I needed to specify the D3DCREATE_FPU_PRESERVE flag when creating a D3D device by D3D.CreateDevice.

Otherwise, without that flag, all floating point operations are performed with single precision. As the TDateTime is a simple Double, and Now() functions is consist of simple addition of date value to time value, it all get messed up by DirectX “smart” override.

Problem solved. It was a tricky one indeed. :)

–jeroen

via: datetime – Delphi Now() function returns a wrong value – Stack Overflow.

Posted in 8087, Algorithms, Delphi, Delphi 2005, Delphi 2006, Delphi 2007, Delphi 2009, Delphi 2010, Delphi 5, Delphi 6, Delphi 7, Delphi XE, Delphi XE2, Delphi XE3, Development, Floating point handling, Software Development | 2 Comments »

Interesting SO question: What are the experiences with using unicode in identifiers?

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/29

Toon Krijthe posted an interesting question to SO.

Though 5 years old, I think it stilll is very valid one:

At my work, we have decided to stay with the ANSI characters for identifiers. Is there anybody out there using unicode identifiers and what are the experiences?

For all projects I work on (in various Languages like  English, German, Dutch or other), I stick to ASCII characters (not even ANSI) for:

  • file names
  • identifiers

I also try to abstract the non-ASCII strings into places where I am sure that the encoding is preserved (for text files, I prefer UTF-8), or where these characters are properly escaped.

What is your take on this?

–jeroen

via: uniqueidentifier – What are the experiences with using unicode in identifiers – Stack Overflow.

Posted in .NET, Agile, AS/400 / iSeries / System i, C, C#, C++, COBOL, Continuous Integration, Delphi, Development, F#, Prism, Scripting, Software Development, VB.NET, Visual Studio and tools | 4 Comments »

Tables with SQL Server and .NET data types

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/23

Thanks StackOverflow users George Stocker for asking, Örjan Jämte and Sir Crispalot for answering.

Below is the SQL Server 2012 table, in which I added links to the various data types.

I also added two columns with linked references to the types from the  C# data types, C# Keywords, Reference Tables for Types (C# Reference) and Data Type Summary (Visual Basic).

One of the things I need to check is against the LINQ SQL-CLR Type Mapping.

It is very important to keep in mind that in SQL, each combination of precision and digits gets you a different decimal type, and all of them are different from the .NET decimal type. See for instance the answers on these questions:

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in .NET, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, Algorithms, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Database Development, Development, Floating point handling, Software Development, SQL Server, SQL Server 2005, SQL Server 2008, SQL Server 2008 R2, SQL Server 2012 | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: Type.IsSubclassOf Method versus Type.IsAssignableFrom

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/22

Every once in a while, you will have to do is checks using reflection.

Basically there are two methods:

Thanks to Ani and Werner Beroux for explaining the difference in more detail on StackOverflow, I added some extra links:

To check for assignability, you can use the Type.IsAssignableFrom method:

typeof(SomeType).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(Derived))

This will work as you expect for

but not when you are looking for ‘assignability’ across explicit / implicit conversion operators.

To check for strict inheritance, you can use Type.IsSubclassOf:

typeof(Derived).IsSubclassOf(typeof(SomeType))

–jeroen

via: c# – How to check if a class inherits another class without instantiating it? – Stack Overflow.

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

Table with the Numeric Data Types in SQL Server

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/22

I couldn’t find a table with numeric data types in SQL Server 2012 on MSDN, but since they have not changed since SQL Server 2008,  I copied the table from Understand the 9 Numeric Data Types in SQL Server 2008, added an entry for bit, and links to the relevant SQL Server 2012 pages at MSDN.

Edit: somehow the WordPress editing system suppressed all the superscripts (for the powers of 2 and 10), so I replaced them with caret signs and powers of 2 and 10 to make it more clear and verified them against Floating point numbers and these Wikipedia pages:

Data Type Range of Values Storage Space

Data Type Range of Values Storage Space
tinyint 0 to 255 1 byte
smallint –32,768 to 32,767 2 bytes
int –2^31 to 2^31–1 4 bytes
bigint –2^63 to 2^63–1 8 bytes
decimal(p,s)
numeric(p,s)		 –10^38+1 to 10^38–1 5 to 17 bytes
smallmoney –214,748.3648 to 214,748.3647 4 bytes
money –922,337,203,685,477.5808 to 922,337,203,685,477.5807 8 bytes
real –3.4*10^38 to –1.18*10^38, 0, and 1.18*10^38 to 3.4*10^38 4 bytes
float(n) –1.79*10^308 to –2.23*10^308, 0, and 2.23*10^308 to 1.79*10^308 4 bytes or 8 bytes
bit 0 to 1 0+ bytes

Later I found an even more complete table at SQL Server Data Types Reference – ConnectionStrings.com.

–jeroen

via: Understand the 9 Numeric Data Types in SQL Server 2008.

Posted in Algorithms, Database Development, Development, Floating point handling, Software Development, SQL Server, SQL Server 2008, SQL Server 2008 R2, SQL Server 2012 | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: check for exact type: simple things are always a good solution (via: Stack Overflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/17

A while ago, I bumped into a situation where someone had tried to solve the problem below with a convoluted reflection based solution for this seemingly simple problem:

class A {}
class B : A {}
B b = new B();
if(b is A) // this should return false

And indeed the solution is simple: replace the “b is a” with this:

b.GetType() == typeof(A)

Thanks StackOverflow users ChaosPandion and John K.

–jeroen

via c# check for exact type – Stack Overflow.

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

A small table that shows differences between decimal, double and float (Single)

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/16

Though you programmers all should have read What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic.

But I know you don’t, so below is a small difference on which floating point comparisons fail when using float (f, Single), double (d) and decimal (m, money) values in C#:

0.1 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.3 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.7 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.5 fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.9 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none

The can help you decide what kind of floating point type you want to use, for instance to answer c# – When should I use double instead of decimal? – Stack Overflow.

I specifically choose the values 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 0.9 to stress the difference between binary and decimal representations. Apart from the decimal type, you cannot store these decimal values in a binary representation. You can see the decimal representation for a double using the DoubleConverter class (thanks Jon Skeet!)

If you are have a problem that isn’t suite for floating point, then don’t use it. Use rational types, IntX, BigInteger or Complex from the System.Numerics namespace, or arbitraty precision floating point numbers.

The failing methods are part of a bigger DecimalDoubleSingleTestProject, for which you will find the source at BeSharp.net repository (you can browse the sources, and access it through SVN and TFS).

That project contains more checks (see the table at the end which includes 0.100000000001 and 0.1222222222222222222221 based on the accuracy you can get with float/double/decimal) and the failing/succeeding methods are the same.

This is what the failing fd_cast_none, fd_cast_up, fm_cast_none and dm_cast_none methods do:

//...
    [TestClass]
    public class UnitTestBase
    {
        protected float f { get; private set; }
        protected double d { get; private set; }
        protected decimal m { get; private set; }
//...
        public void TestMethod_fd_cast_none()
        {
                Assert.AreEqual(f, d);
        }
//...
        public void TestMethod_fd_cast_up()
        {
                Assert.AreEqual((double)f, d);
        }
//...
        public void TestMethod_fm_cast_none()
        {
                Assert.AreEqual(f, m);
        }
//...
        public void TestMethod_dm_cast_none()
        {
                Assert.AreEqual(d, m);
        }
    }

The methods seem to succeed, but that is just the deceiving part: when you carefully select the values you compare, all checks will eventually fail.

The table at the end shows some more literals that fail other tests. It is caused by all these types have different storage formats.

<h3>Conclusion</h3>

When comparing floating point literals, make sure they are of the same type, and select the type according to what precision or representation features you need.

Note this gets even worse when you start calculating with floating points. You will almost always loose accuracy, watch rounding errors and you cannot even do direct AreEqual comparisons any more. Read the articles by Eric Lippert tagged floating+point+arithmetic – Fabulous Adventures In Coding.

--jeroen

Full table:

0.1 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.3 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.5 fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.7 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.9 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none dm_cast_none
0.100000000001 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none
0.300000000003 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none
0.500000000005 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none
0.700000000007 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none
0.900000000009 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none
0.1222222222222222222221 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
0.3222222222222222222223 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
0.5222222222222222222225 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
0.7222222222222222222227 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_down dm_cast_up
0.9222222222222222222229 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
144444444444444444444.1 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_down dm_cast_up
344444444444444444444.3 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
544444444444444444444.5 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
744444444444444444444.7 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up
944444444444444444444.9 fd_cast_none fd_cast_up fm_cast_none fm_cast_up dm_cast_none dm_cast_up

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, Algorithms, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Floating point handling, Jon Skeet, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

.NET/C#: suffixes for compiler number literals (via: Stack Overflow)

Posted by jpluimers on 2013/10/15

A long while I avoided using suffixes to force the C# compiler into a specific type and – like Marc Gravell – used type-catst like (decimal)3.1415. I found out the hardway: it doesn’t work all the time.

(decimal)1.000000000000001 evaluates to 1 whereas
1.000000000000001m evaluates to 1.000000000000001.
In the former case, the computer parses the literal as a double and then casts it to a decimal. – Joe Albahari Apr 15 ’11 at 6:02

My main reason for using the casts was that I kept forgetting the suffixes needed to force a literal to be of a specific type. Hence this post.

The suffixes and casts are not limited to use in consts: any place where a numeric literal is used, you can use a suffix to force a compile time type.

Though documented in sections 2.4.4.2 Integer literals (C#) and 2.4.4.3 Real literals (C#) of the C# standard and appendix C. Grammar (C#). That standard does not contain a comprehensive list, much after I wrote this post I found Value Types Table (C# Reference).

This post only lists the C# suffixes. Abel Braaksma published a blog entry Overview of type suffixes in C# and VB.Net.

StackOverflow user  sixlettervariables has this (slightly) edited list:

var y = 0f; // y is single/float
var z = 0d; // z is double
var r = 0m; // r is decimal
var i = 0U; // i is unsigned int
var j = 0L; // j is long (note capital L for clarity)
var k = 0UL; // k is unsigned long (note capital L for clarity)

Some more background info: Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in .NET, .NET 1.x, .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5, .NET 4.0, .NET 4.5, Algorithms, C#, C# 1.0, C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C# 4.0, C# 5.0, Development, Floating point handling, Software Development | Leave a Comment »

« Previous Entries
Next Entries »