The Wiert Corner – irregular stream of stuff

Jeroen W. Pluimers on .NET, C#, Delphi, databases, and personal interests

  • My badges

  • Twitter Updates

  • My Flickr Stream

  • Pages

  • All categories

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,839 other subscribers

Archive for the ‘Security’ Category

Urgent security advisory – MikroTik – upgrade to 6.41.3 if you can change your bridge implementation, ensure SMB and WWW are not WAN accessible

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/03/31

I both understand the [WayBack] Urgent security advisory – MikroTik and the users reluctant to upgrade: Mikrotik has a history of updates breaking existing behaviour and underdocumenting features and release notes.

The attack is over the www or www-ssl services which by default run on port 80 and 443. You can see on which networks they are bound using this example from the terminal:

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Hardware, Internet, MikroTik, Network-and-equipment, Power User, routers, Security, WinBox | Leave a Comment »

Cracking xkcd Passwords in little time, breaking 12 character passwords in more time… hashing algorithms…

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/03/29

via [WayBack] Cracking xkcd Passwords in 20 Seconds, breaking 12 character passwords and other cyber “I hope I’ve demonstrated that you need unique words, digits and … – Kristian Köhntopp – Google+

Some interesting reads:

–jeroen

Posted in Power User, Security | Leave a Comment »

A beginner’s guide to beefing up your privacy and security online

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/03/19

Want to protect your security and privacy? Here are some places to start:

via: [WayBackI think I’ll keep this article somewhere where I can easily share it with the famz the coming days :) – Roderick Gadellaa – Google+

–jeroen

 

 

Posted in Power User, Security | Leave a Comment »

Packet Sender is a good tool when debugging protocols: free utility to send & receive network packets. TCP, UDP, SSL

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/03/07

It was fitting to bump into [WayBack] Packet Sender is a good tool when debugging protocols…” Written by Dan Nagle… – Lars Fosdal – Google+ on the day presenting [WayBack] Conferences/Network-Protocol-Security.rst at master · jpluimers/Conferences · GitHub

It also means that libssh2-delphi is getting a bit more love soon and will move to github as well after a conversion from mercurial.

Some of the things I learned or got confirmed teaching the session (I love learning by teaching):

Here is some more info:

–jeroen

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Communications Development, Delphi, Development, Encryption, Hardware, Harman Kardon, Home Audio/Video, HTTP, https, HTTPS/TLS security, Internet protocol suite, Let's Encrypt (letsencrypt/certbot), OpenSSL, Power User, Security, Software Development, TCP, TLS | Leave a Comment »

»Smart car = vulnerable car Smart watch = vulnerable watch Smart home =…

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/03/02

I wonder what has become of Hypponen’s law:

Whenever an appliance is described as being “smart”, it’s vulnerable.

[WayBack»Smart car = vulnerable carSmart watch = vulnerable watchSmart home = vulnerable home«– https://twitter.com/mikko/status/808291700921737216 – Jeroen Wiert Pluimers – Google+

via:

[WayBack] »Smart car = vulnerable carSmart watch = vulnerable watchSmart home = vulnerable home«– https://twitter.com/mikko/status/808291700921737216 – Kristian Köhntopp – Google+

–jeroen

 

Posted in Power User, Security | Leave a Comment »

Does this company still exist today? ; DROP TABLE “COMPANIES”;– LTD

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/02/01

About a year ago, this company was incorporated: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/10542519

; DROP TABLE “COMPANIES”;– LTD

[WayBack; DROP TABLE “COMPANIES”;– LTD – Overview (free company information from Companies House)

via: [WayBack] From the Trololo-Dept: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/10542519 – Kristian Köhntopp – Google+

–jeroen

Posted in Database Development, Development, Power User, Security | Leave a Comment »

Using hardware security tokens cross-platform is only slightly more complicat…

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/01/17

Thanks for the excellent comment explaining how to use hardware tokens as a comment to [WayBack] Using hardware security tokens cross-platform is only slightly more complicated than piloting a Space Shuttle. ##sarcasm – Jan Wildeboer – Google+

Jan Wildeboer:

+Jeroen Wiert Pluimers OK. Let’s look a bit at how this works. There are several competing standards/ways to use a security token. Typically you’ll decide between the two most used ones. As a CCID device AKA SmartCard with OpenSC or using gpg-agent. And that’s an either/or question. Some of the security tokens can only work with gpg-agent, some can do both (but not at the same time) and some are only useful as CCID style (e.g. the Nitrokey HSM).

OK. So now we look at platforms. CCID using OpenSC mostly works everywhere, but you might need to install some additional software depending on your OS. Older versions of MacOS X were notoriously bad, since (High) Sierra it has become better.

On Linux it again really depends. The gnome-keyring-agent that is active in a Gnome session really messes everything up, so better deactivate that. Which is not really trivial. But you have to have a socket for ssh-agent to pick up the key, so some stuff goes to your .bash.rc and you have to make some changes to Gnome config.

If you want to use a Yubikey for 2FA, note that it cannot do TOTP (Time based One Time Password) which Amazon wants for AWS auth. So you need another helper app on your computer.

Here’s some articles that explain it in detail:

The middle two links are actually part of the series [WayBack] Yubikey All The Things | EngineerBetter | More than Cloud Foundry specialists which has a third post [WayBack] Yubikeys for Static Secrets | EngineerBetter | More than Cloud Foundry specialists

–jeroen

Posted in *nix, *nix-tools, Communications Development, Development, Internet protocol suite, Power User, Security, SSH, TCP | Leave a Comment »

badssl.com

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/01/11

I wish I had bumped into this when it got released in 2015: [WayBackbadssl.com hosted in the cloud and maintained by two people from Google and Mozilla.

Where ssllabs.com is for checking server-side certificates, this one is for checking clients against many, many (did I already write MANY?) server side configurations both good (with a varying set of security settings like cyphers and key exchanges) and bad.

One of the bad ones is expired.badssl.com which your clients should not be able to connect to without throwing a big error.

Sources are at [WayBack] GitHub – chromium/badssl.com: Memorable site for testing clients against bad SSL configs.

Before using, please read their

Disclaimer

badssl.com is meant for manual testing of security UI in web clients.

Most subdomains are likely to have stable functionality, but anything could change without notice. If you would like a documented guarantee for a particular use case, please file an issue. (Alternatively, you could make a fork and host your own copy.)

badssl.com is not an official Google product. It is offered “AS-IS” and without any warranties.

–jeroen

Posted in Communications Development, Development, HTTP, https, Internet protocol suite, Security, Software Development, TCP, TLS, Web Development | Leave a Comment »

ACME TLS-SNI-01 validation disabled due to vulnerability – Incidents – Let’s Encrypt Community Support

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/01/11

Now that so many sites depend on LetsEncrypt: maybe it is time for a second one.

We’ve received a credible report of a problem with ACME TLS-SNI-01 validation which could allow people to get certificates they should not be able to get. While we investigate further we have disabled tls-sni-01 validation. We’ll post more information soon.

Source: [Archive.isACME TLS-SNI-01 validation disabled due to vulnerability – Incidents – Let’s Encrypt Community Support

Via:

–jeroen

Posted in Encryption, Let's Encrypt (letsencrypt/certbot), Power User, Security | Leave a Comment »

SSLLabs security reports for some embarcadero subdomains

Posted by jpluimers on 2018/01/09

I hope this is a coincidence. Before Nick Hodges left, the TLS security of the various embarcadero https servers was increased, most from grade F. Now they might soon be grade F again.

Hopefully somebody in IT has time to take a renewed look as security needs constant attention.

I’ve only included a fraction of their sub-domains, as really this is a job for the Embarcadero IT department.

Related:

Posted in Encryption, HTTPS/TLS security, Power User, Security | Leave a Comment »